AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Akita · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Akita

17Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Customer success for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 49 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In customer success · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Akita for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Customer success platformsCustomer0%13 of 490%5under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 42%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Akita held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Customer success · by segment

Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 62
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 46
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 19 of 33

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Customer success2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 13 of 49

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Akita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels4
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Are cost-sensitive, small CS team (under 6 people) | Akita / Custify / ClientSuccess” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · scale prompt · alternative
“Best Dedicated "Budget" Platform: Akita” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · alternative
“Akita – Lightest Legitimate Option” Kimi K2 · Customer success · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Akita, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akita was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HubSpot Service Hub14 of 174Not among the top eight
Custify13 of 175Not among the top eight
Gainsight Customer Success13 of 172Not among the top eight
ChurnZero11 of 171Not among the top eight
ClientSuccess9 of 171Not among the top eight
Vitally9 of 171Not among the top eight
Totango8 of 170Not among the top eight
Planhat4 of 171Not among the top eight
Freshdesk3 of 170Not among the top eight
ZapScale3 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Akita. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Akita and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com14
resources.rework.com14
userpilot.com13
appcues.com12
chameleon.io9
workona.com8
guideflow.com7
process.st7
velaris.io6
yellow.ai6

Ninety-six of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Akita came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

akitaapp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Akita takes 0% of first choices and ChurnZero takes 42%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “customer success platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer success platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
135,000 a month (“akita”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
9,342 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 343 a month
Searches its site ranks for
423 · 6 in the top three
Sites linking to it
403
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 49 in customer success
Segment leader
42%
ChurnZero
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on akitaapp.com
747
subdomains included
Content
457
counted in the table below
Documentation
66
Product · Integration
0 · 20
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press326undated
Blog106undated
Glossary or explainer15undated
Comparison7undated
Conference or event1undated
Template or tool1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page akitaapp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Akita

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Akita is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Customer Success Software helps your Customer Success Manager to monitor account health and customer data to lower your churn rate and increase revenue.
For
Customer Success Manager
Price stated
New Pricing starts $49/month akitaapp.com
Starting price
49 akitaapp.com
Free plan or trial
Start a Free 14-Day Trial akitaapp.com
Integrations claimed
100 akitaapp.com
Certifications
GDPR compliantSOC 1SOC 2SOC 3ISO 27001PCI DSS Level 1
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting, customers

What Akita's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: akitaapp.com, akitaapp.com/pricing, akitaapp.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akita's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akita, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akita by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Akita is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Akita, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at akitaapp.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.