Eight of twelve models named ChurnZero first on the direct prompt; zero named Totango. Both were named by all twelve models and ChurnZero carries 58 labels and Totango 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer success platforms page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, ChurnZero and Totango were named in the same answer 117 times, of the 159 answers naming ChurnZero and the 145 naming Totango. In those answers Totango took the first choice two times and ChurnZero sixteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms to AVOID on a Limited Budget | ChurnZero | Starts at ~$849/month + $5K-25K setup fees” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier options like ... Vitally/ChurnZero (custom, $1K+/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget ... generally not where you should start” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd most often recommend ChurnZero if your main goals are customer health scoring, retention, and renewal-risk management” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend ChurnZero as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company's customer health and retention management needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ChurnZero offers the best balance of speed-to-value, purpose-built mid-market fit, and scalable health scoring” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Totango ⚠️ MIXED SIGNALS (Post-Merger Issues) ... 2024 merger with Catalyst created instability and uncertainty” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if: You rely on good support responsiveness or need strong integrations with your existing stack.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“One of the most persistent complaints about Totango is its rigid contract structures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Totango: Best for SaaS companies managing a large, growing customer base that needs standardized playbooks” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need truly free functionality, Totango is the standout.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Alternative Options: Totango - Best for: Companies wanting enterprise features without enterprise complexity” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.