Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
“Consistently rated as the most expensive option at scale... A poor fit for cost-sensitive teams” Kimi K2, negative prompt
“here are the product analytics platforms you should be cautious about or avoid:... **Heap** (by Contentsquare) - **Data inaccuracy**” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
“**Avoid GA4** for EU-based products or if you need product-level insights (it's marketing-focused)” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
“Highest Caution: Mixpanel ... When to avoid: If handling sensitive user data or EU users” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
19 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 183 links across 83 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.