Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
“MillionVerifier — questionable support and billing.** The cheapest options often hide the most pain” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
“**Verdict**: Avoid for critical campaigns due to reliability and support issues” Mistral Small, negative prompt
“Many prospecting suites (like Hunter.io or Snov.io) bundle email verification into their monthly subscriptions... avoid tools that force you into recurring plans” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
“Several providers (ZeroBounce, NeverBounce, Bouncer's monthly credits) expire credits, which punishes infrequent users” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
21 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 5 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 209 links across 91 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.