Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 17 → 8 of 51
1 category · RankedEmailable
66Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Email verification for small business buyers
Rank 15 of 65 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Emailable →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 56
2%23 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market15 of 65
0%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 52
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Emailable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 15 of 65 | 0% | 22 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Emailable held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email verification · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 61
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 12 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 of 65, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Emailable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Emailable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative26 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Emailable and ZeroBounce are often cited as the most accurate (up to 99%).” Mistral Small · Email verification · comparative prompt · first choice
“Emailable: 250 free credits, pay-as-you-go from $0.002\u2013$0.007/email. Top-rated (4.8/5)” Grok 4.20 · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative
“"Best speed \u2013 In my tests, Emailable helped me get verification results the fastest"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Emailable excels in speed with 0.012-second processing, outpacing competitors by 40%” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Emailable, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Emailable was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Emailable, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Emailable was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Emailable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 66 answers that named Emailable and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
kickbox.com42
usebouncer.com36
overloop.com28
sender.net25
hunter.io24
sparkle.io24
zerobounce.net23
billionverify.com19
snov.io19
emailvendorselection.com18
258 of the 258 domain citations in answers naming Emailable came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
emailable.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Emailable takes 0% of first choices and ZeroBounce takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
emailable.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Emailable takes 0% of first choices and ZeroBounce takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email verification service”
6
Position for “best email verification service”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“emailable”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 601,367 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,645 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,158 · 18 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,996
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown September 2025, as Digital Funda, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 65 in email verification
Segment leader
42%
ZeroBounce
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 66 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 66 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on emailable.com
482
subdomains included
Content
188
counted in the table below
Documentation
72
Product · Integration
0 · 165
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 153 | 99 | 2026-09-29 | Email verification, CRM | |
| Comparison | 18 | undated | |||
| News or press | 11 | 11 | 2026-09-29 | Email verification | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 4 | 2026-09-29 | Email verification | |
| Case study | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Why email verification belongs in your signup flow blog
- 2026-09-29Why b2b email lists are harder to verify than b2c lists blog
- 2026-09-29Signs you should be using an email checker blog
- 2026-09-29Email data myths blog
- 2026-09-29Why should you verify email addresses blog
- 2026-09-29Clean customer data sales stack blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page emailable.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Emailable
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Emailable.ShowHide
The company
Emailable.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- emailable.com
- Headquarters
- Montebello, United States
- Founded
- 2017
- Ownership
- Part of Cache Ventures
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Email verification service & software
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Includes 250 free credits; pricing starts at $0 and goes up to $2100.0 emailable.com
- Starting price
- 0 emailable.com
- Free plan or trial
- Includes 250 free credits emailable.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 emailable.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II CertifiedGDPR Compliant
- Customers named
- Funky Christmas Jumpersleadlovers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Emailable's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: emailable.com, emailable.com/pricing, trust.emailable.com, emailable.com/customers, emailable.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Emailable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Emailable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Emailable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Emailable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Emailable, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.