Small business=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 of 51, unchanged
2 categories · RankedEmailListVerify
39Judge labels
6First choices
9Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Email verification for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 65 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of EmailListVerify →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 56
5%15 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 65
4%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise51 of 52
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named EmailListVerify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 4% | 7 of 65 | 18% | 17 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email deliverability and testing tools | Marketing | 2% | 16 of 110 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34% |
Movement
Since September 2026, EmailListVerify held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email verification · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 61
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 49 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email deliverability | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 16 of 110, unchanged |
| Email verification | 4% | 4% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 65, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated EmailListVerify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated EmailListVerify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels6
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“EmailListVerify appears to be the best option for companies with limited budgets” MiniMax M2.5 · Email deliverability · budget prompt · first choice
“EmailListVerify stands out as one of the best email verification services” Grok 4.20 · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Budget Option: EmailListVerify” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“EmailListVerify is also worth considering, with one review citing $24 per 10K” Perplexity Sonar · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Budget/low-cost options like EmailListVerify, MillionVerifier, and DeBounce - Approach with caution” Grok 4.20 · Email verification · negative prompt · soft negative
“EmailListVerify offer the lowest cost per 10k emails but lack advanced deliverability features” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email verification · budget prompt · soft negative
“Email List Verify users reported repeated Gmail SMTP protocol errors” GPT-5.4 mini · Email verification · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EmailListVerify, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EmailListVerify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EmailListVerify, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EmailListVerify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EmailListVerify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 39 answers that named EmailListVerify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sender.net23
usebouncer.com22
kickbox.com21
overloop.com20
prospeo.io18
sparkle.io17
hunter.io14
snov.io14
mailtrap.io13
clearout.io12
174 of the 174 domain citations in answers naming EmailListVerify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
emaillistverify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EmailListVerify takes 4% of first choices and ZeroBounce takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
emaillistverify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EmailListVerify takes 4% of first choices and ZeroBounce takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email verification service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email verification service”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“emaillistverify”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,192 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,873 · 53 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,344
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 65 in email verification
Segment leader
42%
ZeroBounce
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 39 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 39 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on emaillistverify.com
227
subdomains included
Content
119
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 93 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | Email verification, SEO | |
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2026-03-30 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 3 | 0 | 2023-12-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2023-11-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-07-02Biggest catch all offender blog
- 2026-06-29Best email finder tools blog
- 2026-05-26Spam email management blog
- 2026-05-21Scrub email lists blog
- 2026-05-20Spam traps blog
- 2026-05-20Double opt in blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page emaillistverify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as EmailListVerify
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EmailListVerify; a claim can dispute any of them.
Email List Verify 2
Follow EmailListVerify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
EmailListVerify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
EmailListVerify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Full-Featured Email Verification. But half the price.
- For
- Businesses and email marketers looking to verify bulk email lists and improve deliverability
- Price stated
- Flexible pricing options: Pay as you go and Monthly subscription; 1,000 credits $6.99.99USD, $0.00699 USD / credit; 5,000 credits $24.99.99USD, $0.00500 USD / credit; 10,000 credits $27.99.99USD, $0.00280 USD / credit; 25,000 credits $58USD, $0.00232 USD / credit; 50,000 credits $119USD, $0.00238 USD / credit; 100,000 credits $199USD, $0.00199 USD / credit; 5,000 credits $16 / mo., $0.00320 / credit; 10,000 credits $25 / mo., $0.00250 / credit; 25,000 credits $49 / mo., $0.00196 / credit; 50,000 credits $89 / mo., $0.00178 / credit; 100,000 credits $168 / mo., $0.00168 / credit; 250,000 credits $346 / mo., $0.00138 / credit; 500,000 credits $446 / mo., $0.00089 / credit; 1,000,000 credits $594 / mo., $0.00059 / credit; 2,500,000 credits $1,170 / mo., $0.00047 / credit; 5,000,000 credits $1,980 / mo., $0.00040 / credit; 10,000,000 credits $3,240 / mo., $0.00032 / credit; 25,000,000 credits $8,100 / mo., $0.00032 / credit; 30,000,000 credits $9,720 / mo., $0.00032 / credit emaillistverify.com
- Starting price
- 6.99.99USD emaillistverify.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get 100 FREE verifications; 100 free verification credits when you sign up emaillistverify.com
- Integrations claimed
- 7 emaillistverify.com · 13 emaillistverify.com/integrations pages disagree
- Certifications
- GDRP compliantGDPR compliant
- Customers named
- Mangools
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What EmailListVerify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: emaillistverify.com, emaillistverify.com/pricing, emaillistverify.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EmailListVerify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EmailListVerify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EmailListVerify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where EmailListVerify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name EmailListVerify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.