Zero of fourteen models named MillionVerifier first on the direct prompt; zero named EmailListVerify. MillionVerifier was named by twelve of the fourteen models and EmailListVerify by eleven and MillionVerifier carries 20 labels and EmailListVerify 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email verification page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, MillionVerifier and EmailListVerify were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 53 answers naming MillionVerifier and the 39 naming EmailListVerify. In those answers EmailListVerify took the first choice four times and MillionVerifier two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“MillionVerifier is the one most often singled out with documented false positives and billing complaints — proceed with caution there.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“MillionVerifier and EmailListVerify offer the lowest cost per 10k emails but lack advanced deliverability features” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Budget/low-cost options like EmailListVerify, MillionVerifier, and DeBounce - Approach with caution” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose MillionVerifier if you have a very large list (e.g., 10k+) to clean at once and want the lowest bulk price.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“MillionVerifier – Best Overall Value ... If you need the absolute lowest cost: Go with MillionVerifier” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with MillionVerifier – 100 free credits to test, then pay-as-you-go with no expiration” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Budget/low-cost options like EmailListVerify, MillionVerifier, and DeBounce - Approach with caution” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“EmailListVerify offer the lowest cost per 10k emails but lack advanced deliverability features” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Email List Verify users reported repeated Gmail SMTP protocol errors” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“EmailListVerify stands out as one of the best email verification services” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Budget Option: EmailListVerify” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“EmailListVerify is also worth considering, with one review citing $24 per 10K” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.