Bouncer vs EmailListVerify
Four of twelve models named Bouncer first on the direct prompt; zero named EmailListVerify. Bouncer was named by eleven of the twelve models and EmailListVerify by ten and Bouncer carries 40 labels and EmailListVerify 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email verification page.
By framing
BouncerFirst choices, of twelve modelsEmailListVerify
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Bouncer and EmailListVerify were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 114 answers naming Bouncer and the 49 naming EmailListVerify. In those answers EmailListVerify took the first choice one time and Bouncer twenty-four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Bouncer EmailListVerify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Bouncer on the left and EmailListVerify on the right.The direct prompt
Bouncer first, EmailListVerify not the choice
4 of 12 modelsEmailListVerify was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Bouncer33%#1 of 10EmailListVerify4%#6 of 10Bouncer24%#2 of 11EmailListVerify4%#6 of 11What the models said about Bouncer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Well-regarded alternatives with stronger track records ... include Bouncer, ZeroBounce, Kickbox, and NeverBounce” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Bouncer as the best all-around value (great accuracy, flexible non-expiring pricing, 100 free credits to trial)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend evaluating Skrapp or Bouncer first, as they balance accuracy, ease of use, and workflow integration” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about EmailListVerify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“A classic budget option, though some independent audits show lower accuracy than top-tier competitors.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“EmailListVerify: 93.2% real accuracy (lowest tested)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best choice is usually EmailListVerify if you want the lowest cost per verification” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute lowest cost: Choose EmailListVerify at $24 for 10K emails.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“the budget option on this list and delivers accordingly, with free supplementary tools adding real value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.