1 category · RankedMillionVerifier
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 49 of 53 | 50% | 14 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Clearout, EmailListVerify, or MillionVerifier if cost is the main constraint.” Perplexity Sonar · Email verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“Go with MillionVerifier if you have a massive list of over 50,000 emails to clean in one go.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative
“Commonly recommended for price-to-accuracy, especially when volume matters most.” Perplexity Sonar · Email verification · direct prompt · alternative
“For Quick Verification: MillionVerifier (one-time purchases)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email verification · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“MillionVerifier — questionable support and billing. The cheapest options often hide the most pain” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Services with Notable Complaints... MillionVerifier - Accuracy often falls below the advertised 99%” MiniMax M2.5 · Email verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“MillionVerifier ⚠️ Highest Caution ... "shell company" with no real customer support” Kimi K2 · Email verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Accuracy is slightly lower (96%), so skip this if your campaigns are near the bounce-rate danger threshold.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email verification · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 39 answers that named MillionVerifier and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming MillionVerifier came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MillionVerifier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MillionVerifier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at millionverifier.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.