GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › MyEmailVerifier · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

MyEmailVerifier

13Judge labels
6First choices
2Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Email verification for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 53 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MyEmailVerifier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Email verificationGTM data and infrastructure6%5 of 5329%7under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MyEmailVerifier yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MyEmailVerifier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels6
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best email verification service for a company with a limited budget is MyEmailVerifier, which is the most affordable email verification service in 2026” Llama 4 Maverick · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“MyEmailVerifier is the most affordable email verification service at $0.0025 per verification, the lowest pay-as-you-go rate currently available.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“For most businesses, DeBounce or MyEmailVerifier offer the best balance of cost, accuracy, and features.” MiniMax M2.5 · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“some sources name MyEmailVerifier as the cheapest at $0.0025 per verification, though this is based on fewer comparisons” Perplexity Sonar · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While newer entrants like *MyEmailVerifier* advertise rates as low as $0.0025/call, verify their independent accuracy benchmarks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email verification · budget prompt · soft negative
“MyEmailVerifier ⚠️ Use With Caution - Reports of false "verified" results that later bounce at high rates” Kimi K2 · Email verification · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MyEmailVerifier, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MyEmailVerifier was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EmailListVerify9 of 131Not in the top three
DeBounce8 of 130Not in the top three
ZeroBounce7 of 131Not in the top three
Clearout7 of 130Not in the top three
Bouncer6 of 133Not in the top three
MillionVerifier5 of 132Not in the top three
Hunter4 of 131Not in the top three
NeverBounce4 of 131Not in the top three
Kickbox3 of 131Not in the top three
Proofy.io3 of 131Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MyEmailVerifier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 13 answers that named MyEmailVerifier and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

debounce.com2
emailvendorselection.com2
mailtrap.io2
myemailverifier.comYour site2
accuwebhosting.com1
billionverify.com1
bouncecheck.email1
bounceko.com1
buzzlead.io1
clay.com1

Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming MyEmailVerifier came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MyEmailVerifier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MyEmailVerifier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at myemailverifier.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack