Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 41 of 51
1 category · Named, not rankedMyEmailVerifier
8Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MyEmailVerifier was named 4 times in Email verification, where ZeroBounce led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business42 of 56
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market57 of 65
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise46 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MyEmailVerifier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 57 of 65 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 42% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MyEmailVerifier held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email verification · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 5 → 54 of 61
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 44 of 50, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 57 of 65 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MyEmailVerifier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MyEmailVerifier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MyEmailVerifier provides the best combination of price and accuracy” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · comparative prompt · alternative
“MyEmailVerifier - 4.7/5 Capterra, pay-per-use option” Kimi K2 · Email verification · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users claim service stopped working with no resolution” MiniMax M2.5 · Email verification · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why to be cautious: The company appears to make exaggerated claims ("Guaranteed Accuracy") and has limited transparency” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email verification · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MyEmailVerifier, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MyEmailVerifier was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MyEmailVerifier, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MyEmailVerifier was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MyEmailVerifier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named MyEmailVerifier and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
usebouncer.com7
sender.net5
capterra.com4
myemailverifier.comYour site4
snov.io4
sparkle.io4
getmailbird.com3
hunter.io3
kickbox.com3
lagrowthmachine.com3
Thirty-six of the forty domain citations in answers naming MyEmailVerifier came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
myemailverifier.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MyEmailVerifier takes 0% of first choices and ZeroBounce takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
myemailverifier.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MyEmailVerifier takes 0% of first choices and ZeroBounce takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email verification service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email verification service”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“myemailverifier”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,222 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,535 · 12 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 626
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 57 of 65 in email verification
Segment leader
42%
ZeroBounce
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on myemailverifier.com
830
subdomains included
Content
338
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 47
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 303 | 7 | 2026-08-29 | Email verification, Email marketing | |
| Comparison | 27 | 2 | 2026-07-22 | Email verification | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-03-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-29Does ai written email get flagged as spam blog
- 2026-08-04Eu ai act cold email rules blog
- 2026-08-01Saas lead generation blog
- 2026-08-01Linkedin lead generation blog
- 2026-07-22Bouncer alternatives comparison
- 2026-07-21Emailable alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page myemailverifier.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MyEmailVerifier
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MyEmailVerifier is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MyEmailVerifier is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Bulk Email Verifier: Real-Time Email Verification
- For
- Businesses, email marketers, SaaS, e-commerce, and lead generation teams
- Price stated
- From $12 per 10,000 Emails myemailverifier.com
- Starting price
- 12 myemailverifier.com
- Free plan or trial
- 100 free credits daily; No Credit Card Required myemailverifier.com
- Integrations claimed
- 20 myemailverifier.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 CertifiedGDPR Compliant
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting, customers
What MyEmailVerifier's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: myemailverifier.com, myemailverifier.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MyEmailVerifier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MyEmailVerifier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MyEmailVerifier by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MyEmailVerifier is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MyEmailVerifier, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.