| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 6% | 5 of 53 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 29% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best email verification service for a company with a limited budget is MyEmailVerifier, which is the most affordable email verification service in 2026” Llama 4 Maverick · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“MyEmailVerifier is the most affordable email verification service at $0.0025 per verification, the lowest pay-as-you-go rate currently available.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“For most businesses, DeBounce or MyEmailVerifier offer the best balance of cost, accuracy, and features.” MiniMax M2.5 · Email verification · budget prompt · first choice
“some sources name MyEmailVerifier as the cheapest at $0.0025 per verification, though this is based on fewer comparisons” Perplexity Sonar · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“While newer entrants like *MyEmailVerifier* advertise rates as low as $0.0025/call, verify their independent accuracy benchmarks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email verification · budget prompt · soft negative
“MyEmailVerifier ⚠️ Use With Caution - Reports of false "verified" results that later bounce at high rates” Kimi K2 · Email verification · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 13 answers that named MyEmailVerifier and are not a share of its labels.
Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming MyEmailVerifier came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MyEmailVerifier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MyEmailVerifier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at myemailverifier.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.