GTM AI Index
September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published September 9, 2026. The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index Partner and channel September 2026 Edition

Partner relationship management

Asked as “partner relationship management platform”, and as “PRM software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing
Contested
24% of first choices, contested.

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Channeltivity24%5%37accepted challenger
02PartnerPortal.io24%0%26accepted challenger
03JourneyBee18%0%22accepted challenger
04Impartner7%41%34criticized challenger
05PartnerStack4%22%45accepted challenger
06Kiflo2%5%38accepted challenger
07Channelscaler2%16%38accepted challenger
08Salesforce PRM2%35%37criticized challenger
09Impartner PRM2%41%17criticized challenger
10ZINFI2%33%18criticized challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14impact.com0%38%13criticized challenger
13Unifyr0%27%15criticized challenger
12Magentrix0%14%14accepted challenger
11Introw0%0%14accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Channeltivity24%
02PartnerPortal.io24%
03JourneyBee18%
04Impartner7%
05PartnerStack4%
06Kiflo2%
07Channelscaler2%
08Salesforce PRM2%
09Impartner PRM2%
10ZINFI2%
11Introw0%
12Magentrix0%
13Unifyr0%
14impact.com0%

02What they warned about

A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Impartner
41%
14 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 6 models · 3 hard negative
“enterprise-heavy tools like Impartner/ZINFI (~$20k+/yr) are overkill for mid-sized” Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt
Salesforce PRM
35%
13 of 37 labels negative · 8 of 6 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid if: You are a startup or mid-market company looking for a portal you can spin up and manage yourself within a few weeks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
PartnerStack
22%
10 of 45 labels negative · 7 of 6 models · 3 hard negative
“Trustpilot rating of 2.0/5 driven by payout delays, withheld commissions, and sudden account closures” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Impartner PRM
41%
7 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 6 models · 2 hard negative
“Users frequently complain about long implementation times ... Avoid if: You want a highly agile, self-service platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: four of the six in this edition.

Sites the answers cite

21 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 177 links across 80 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.

vendor site · Monday.com9 answers · 9 citations · 2 models
vendor site · PartnerPortal.io7 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
6 answers · 11 citations · 2 models
6 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · JourneyBee5 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
vendor site · ZINFI5 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Guideflow5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Partnerplace5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Introw4 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Gartner4 answers · 4 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Siren Affiliates4 answers · 4 citations · 2 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ModelDirect“What is the best partner relationship management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which PRM software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top partner relationship management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best partner relationship management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a partner relationship management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which partner relationship management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Claude Opus 4.8no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-6 Astrano first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.6 Solno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.1 Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Perplexity Sonar Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Zero rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency

Noise floor in this category

Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings
Salesforce read as Salesforce PRM
Zoho read as Zoho CRM
Unresolved, counted raw
GlassHive
HubSpot Channel Manager
Microsoft Cloud Partner Center (Dynamics 365)
Microsoft Dynamics 365 PRM
Siren
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Channel marketingReferrals →