Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsNot ranked
HubSpot · 1 category · Named, not rankedHubSpot for Marketers
4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HubSpot for Marketers was named 3 times in Content marketing, where HubSpot Content Hub led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market16 of 135
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise56 of 122
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HubSpot for Marketers for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 16 of 135 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HubSpot for Marketers held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 82 → 43 of 134
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 22 → 48 of 111
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 82 → 16 of 135 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HubSpot for Marketers across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HubSpot for Marketers across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best default: HubSpot for Marketers—if you want one platform to create and publish content, capture leads, nurture them, and connect marketing activity to pipeline.” GPT-6 Luna · Content marketing · direct prompt · first choice
“HubSpot for Marketers (best overall for SMBs to enterprise teams, offering deep personalization and connecting content to revenue with a built-in CRM)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Content marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot for Marketers, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot for Marketers was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot for Marketers, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot for Marketers was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot for Marketers. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named HubSpot for Marketers and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.comYour site3
distribb.io2
thecmo.com2
worldmetrics.org2
business.adobe.com1
contently.com1
dupple.com1
eesel.ai1
experienceleague.adobe.com1
floyi.com1
Twelve of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming HubSpot for Marketers came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as HubSpot for Marketers
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot for Marketers; a claim can dispute any of them.
HubSpot for Marketers / HubSpot Content Marketing Platform 1
Follow HubSpot for Marketers
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot for Marketers.ShowHide
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot for Marketers.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- hubspot.com
- Headquarters
- Cambridge, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Employees
- about 8,246 (2024)
- Ownership
- Public, HUBS on New York Stock Exchange
- Also from HubSpot
- HubSpot, HubSpot ABM, HubSpot AEO Grader, HubSpot AI, HubSpot Academy, HubSpot Ad Management, HubSpot Ads, HubSpot Ads Management and 77 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Marketing automation software
- Price stated
- Free and premium plans academy.hubspot.com/ai-for-marketers-ja
- Free plan or trial
- Free and premium plans academy.hubspot.com/AI-for-Marketers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What HubSpot for Marketers's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: academy.hubspot.com/AI-for-Marketers, academy.hubspot.com/cms-for-marketers, academy.hubspot.com/ai-for-marketers-fr, academy.hubspot.com/ai-for-marketers-ja, academy.hubspot.com/hubspot-sales-content. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot for Marketers's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot for Marketers, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HubSpot for Marketers by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HubSpot for Marketers is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HubSpot for Marketers, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.