Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 33 of 120
1 category · Named, not rankedContentStudio
10Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ContentStudio was named 1 time in Content marketing, where HubSpot Content Hub led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business29 of 126
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market58 of 135
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise109 of 122
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ContentStudio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 58 of 135 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ContentStudio held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 134 → 54 of 134
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 94 → 97 of 111
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 134 → 58 of 135 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ContentStudio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ContentStudio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ContentStudio is best for social-first teams and agencies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ContentStudio, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContentStudio was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ContentStudio, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContentStudio was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContentStudio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named ContentStudio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com8
distribb.io5
thecmo.com5
trysight.ai5
g2.com4
hubspot.com4
megri.com4
storychief.io4
dupple.com3
nealschaffer.com3
Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming ContentStudio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on contentstudio.io
2,244
subdomains included
Content
1,233
counted in the table below
Documentation
500
Product · Integration
0 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 919 | 22 | 2026-09-28 | Social media, SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 166 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | SEO | |
| Template or tool | 61 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | ||
| Comparison | 48 | 0 | 2026-02-02 | SEO | |
| Case study | 20 | 0 | 2021-09-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 8 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2025-03-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2023-11-03 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Forum conference or event
- 2026-09-28Newsletter composer news or press
- 2026-09-28Google ads conversion tracking blog
- 2026-09-28Best saas affiliate programs blog
- 2026-09-24Linkedin business page blog
- 2026-09-24Product photo to video ads claude code blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page contentstudio.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (13); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ContentStudio
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ContentStudio is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ContentStudio is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unified Social Media Management Tool
- For
- agencies, brands, and marketing teams
- Price stated
- 19.00 contentstudio.io
- Starting price
- 19.00 contentstudio.io
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial - No credit card required. contentstudio.io
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantSSL encryptionindependently assessed through Google's CASA security program every yearPayment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)Cloud App Security Assessment (CASA)ISO 27017ISO 27018SOC 1
- Hosting
- top tier European data centers
- Customers named
- The Modern FirmQabiriaWebeingRiselyHurbMarinetWebegin
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What ContentStudio's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: contentstudio.io, contentstudio.io/pricing, contentstudio.io/security, contentstudio.io/customers, contentstudio.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContentStudio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContentStudio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ContentStudio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ContentStudio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ContentStudio, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.