Every category where a model named Adobe GenStudio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	25 of 159	18%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adobe GenStudio yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adobe GenStudio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Large enterprises with complex, multi-channel operations in the Adobe ecosystem” Mistral Small · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Large enterprises managing complex "content supply chains" and digital assets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Large Enterprises already using Adobe ecosystem... Custom/Expensive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“4. Adobe GenStudio - For companies wanting AI-powered features” MiniMax M2.5 · Content marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“enterprise giants (who need massive, expensive systems like Adobe GenStudio or Sitecore Content Hub)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · direct prompt · soft negative

“only realistic if you're already deep in the Adobe ecosystem” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe GenStudio, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe GenStudio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HubSpot Content Hub24 of 3212Not in the top three

Optimizely CMP20 of 321Not in the top three

Contently15 of 320Not in the top three

Skyword Accelerator36014 of 320Not in the top three

CoSchedule11 of 322Not in the top three

Skyword10 of 320Not in the top three

Semrush8 of 321Not in the top three

Buffer7 of 320Not in the top three

StoryChief7 of 320Not in the top three

HubSpot Marketing Hub5 of 321Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe GenStudio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 32 answers that named Adobe GenStudio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com3

gartner.com2

hubspot.com2

nealschaffer.com2

omnibound.ai2

storychief.io2

thecmo.com2

aigrowthagent.co1

blog.aigrowthagent.co1

contentful.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Adobe GenStudio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.hubspot.com/website/content-marketing-platform3

gartner.com/reviews/market/content-marketing-platforms2

hubspot.com/products/content2

nealschaffer.com/content-marketing-platform2

omnibound.ai/blog/content-marketing-tools2

storychief.io/blog/content-marketing-platform2

aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-content-marketing-platforms-20261

blog.aigrowthagent.co/best-ai-content-marketing-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Adobe is the company behind Adobe GenStudio.

Website: adobe.com
Headquarters: San Jose, United States
Founded: 1982
Employees: about 25,988 (2021)
Ownership: Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe GenStudio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe GenStudio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.