Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 142 → 109 of 120
Adobe · 2 categories · RankedAdobe GenStudio
40Judge labels
2First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Creative automation for enterprise buyers
Rank 39 of 135 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business115 of 126
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market39 of 135
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise25 of 122
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adobe GenStudio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 39 of 135 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 0% | 28 of 109 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adobe GenStudio held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 107 of 134
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 23 of 111
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 39 of 135 |
| Creative automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 109, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adobe GenStudio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adobe GenStudio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative18 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. Adobe GenStudio + Firefly - Best for: Large enterprises with existing Adobe ecosystems” Kimi K2 · Creative automation · comparative prompt · first choice
“Evaluate Adobe GenStudio / Firefly Creative Production if your goal is connected content production and governance across an existing Adobe environment.” GPT-6 Luna · Creative automation · scale prompt · alternative
“Complex, high-volume content supply chain in an Adobe-centered organization | Adobe GenStudio” GPT-6 Luna · Content marketing · direct prompt · alternative
“Need enterprise-scale creative production and brand control? Evaluate Adobe GenStudio.” GPT-6 Luna · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“enterprise conglomerates that require heavy, developer-dependent suites (like Adobe GenStudio)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · direct prompt · soft negative
“However, it comes with a high barrier to entry and a steep learning curve.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe GenStudio, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe GenStudio was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe GenStudio, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe GenStudio was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe GenStudio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named Adobe GenStudio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
creatify.ai19
bannerflow.com18
marq.com14
tryatria.com13
blog.hubspot.com12
superside.com12
business.adobe.comYour site11
celtra.com11
g2.com11
gartner.com11
121 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Adobe GenStudio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Adobe GenStudio stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Adobe GenStudio stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“adobe genstudio”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Adobe's site (adobe.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 135 in content marketing
Segment leader
33%
HubSpot Content Hub
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 40 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Adobe GenStudio
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe GenStudio; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe GenStudio + Firefly 1Adobe GenStudio / Adobe 1Adobe GenStudio / Firefly Creative Production 1
Follow Adobe GenStudio
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe GenStudio.ShowHide
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe GenStudio.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- adobe.com
- Headquarters
- San Jose, United States
- Founded
- 1982
- Employees
- about 25,988 (2021)
- Ownership
- Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a platform that allows you to create and manage your performance marketing campaigns
- For
- developers building their own integrations with GenStudio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Adobe GenStudio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.adobe.com/genstudio-api, developer.adobe.com/genstudio-api/api, developer.adobe.com/genstudio-api/guides, developer.adobe.com/genstudio-api/getting-started, developer.adobe.com/genstudio-api/guides/experience-events. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe GenStudio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe GenStudio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe GenStudio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adobe GenStudio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe GenStudio, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.