Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
“**Verdict:** Avoid unless you're a large enterprise with dedicated admin resources and budget for the full suite.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
“Avoid starting new implementations with: ... Intercom/Fin (until Salesforce integration clarifies)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
“smaller or earlier-stage teams should avoid it at this stage because the **implementation complexity isn't worth it**” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
“ServiceNow's rigid, aging platform often requires forced upgrades, can exhibit performance issues, demands heavy maintenance” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
22 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 221 links across 106 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.