Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 12 → 4 of 39
2 categories · RankedJune
32Judge labels
4First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Product analytics for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 40 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 41
3%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market6 of 40
3%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 53
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In product analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named June for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 3% | 6 of 40 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 44 of 142 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, June held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Product analytics · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 21 → 6 of 38
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 42 → 15 of 48
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product analytics | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 6 of 40 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 76 → 44 of 142 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated June across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated June across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels1
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need to track companies and teams rather than just individual users, June is built for that use case.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Product analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, June is the most tailored and user-friendly option” Mistral Small · Product analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If your primary focus is B2B-specific metrics like account tracking and team usage, definitely look at June” MiniMax M2.5 · Product analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“June - focuses on B2B SaaS, tracking companies and teams rather than just individual users.” Llama 4 Maverick · Product analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as June, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and June was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as June, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and June was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named June. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named June and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
amplitude.com21
gainsight.com21
cleverx.com19
productschool.com18
checkthat.ai16
pendo.io15
learn.g2.com14
userpilot.com14
posthog.com13
guideflow.com11
162 of the 162 domain citations in answers naming June came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
june.so is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, June takes 3% of first choices and Amplitude Analytics takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
june.so is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, June takes 3% of first choices and Amplitude Analytics takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “product analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best product analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“june”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 209,401 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,167 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,085 · 28 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 984
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 6 of 40 in product analytics
Segment leader
34%
Amplitude Analytics
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 32 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on june.so
591
subdomains included
Content
223
counted in the table below
Documentation
300
Product · Integration
0 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 174 | 0 | 2025-07-08 | CRM, Product analytics | |
| Case study | 20 | 0 | 2025-04-28 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 0 | 2025-06-19 | CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2024-09-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2024-11-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2022-11-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2022-01-13 |
Most recent
- 2025-07-08A new chapter blog
- 2025-06-19Crm vs csp comparison
- 2025-06-10Hubspot customer success blog
- 2025-06-04Embedded product analytics blog
- 2025-05-29Crm integrated product analytics blog
- 2025-05-23Churn probability blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page june.so exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as June
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as June; a claim can dispute any of them.
June.so 4June (June.so) 1
Follow June
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
June is its own company.ShowHide
The company
June is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- product analytics software for B2B SaaS
- For
- B2B SaaS
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial june.so/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 3 june.so
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR CompliantGDPR Ready
- Customers named
- LuminovoArrowsTrueClicksKnackClerkVevCommandbarRequestly
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What June's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: june.so, june.so/pricing, june.so/security, june.so/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when June's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as June, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for June by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where June is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name June, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.