Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 37 of 42
5 categories · RankedGainsight PX
40Judge labels
3First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Product analytics for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 45 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business38 of 42
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 45
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In digital adoption · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gainsight PX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital adoption and onboarding | Customer | 0% | 18 of 45 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Product analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 17 of 40 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Community platforms | Customer | 0% | 28 of 75 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Bettermode at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 41 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 39 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gainsight PX held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Digital adoption · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 18 of 45
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital adoption | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 18 of 45 |
| Product analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 17 of 40 |
| Community | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 75, unchanged |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 104, unchanged |
| Feedback | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 84, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gainsight PX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gainsight PX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels2
Paraphrase10 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Also listed among the top mid-market options, Gainsight PX is designed for customer success and product experience” Mistral Small · Digital adoption · direct prompt · alternative
“Pendo or Gainsight PX: If your primary focus is gathering feedback *inside* a SaaS software application” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feedback · scale prompt · alternative
“If your product is SaaS and you want in-app guidance alongside project management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client onboarding · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“listed as mid-market options in a 2025 feature/pros/cons comparison” Muse Glimmer 30B · Digital adoption · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be Cautious of "Analytics-First" Platforms (e.g., Pendo, Gainsight PX)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Digital adoption · negative prompt · soft negative
“Heavier focus on CS workflows than deep analytics” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Product analytics · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gainsight PX, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gainsight PX was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gainsight PX, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gainsight PX was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gainsight PX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 40 answers that named Gainsight PX and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com22
gainsight.comYour site21
userpilot.com20
pendo.io19
amplitude.com14
g2.com14
learn.g2.com14
productschool.com14
checkthat.ai10
cleverx.com10
137 of the 158 domain citations in answers naming Gainsight PX came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gainsight.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gainsight PX takes 0% of first choices and Userpilot takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gainsight.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gainsight PX takes 0% of first choices and Userpilot takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital adoption platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best digital adoption platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“gainsight px”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 59,569 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,983 · 828 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,940
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 45 in digital adoption
Segment leader
30%
Userpilot
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gainsight.com
9,988
subdomains included
Content
3,742
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,399
Product · Integration
20 · 114
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,394 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1,146 | 16 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 377 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 343 | 12 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 266 | 0 | 2026-04-13 | ||
| Case study | 92 | 8 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 49 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Comparison | 42 | 4 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 17 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23211 notions outcomes architects on why csms dont need experience anymore podcast or video
- 2026-09-23Expansion Opportunities report or ebook
- 2026-09-17Blog saas strategies for improving customer experience blog
- 2026-09-1711 capabilities to evaluate when choosing a community platform conference or event
- 2026-09-16The pace race how ce teams keep up when products never stop shipping conference or event
- 2026-09-16210 owning retention standardizing cs across 17 acquisitions ft rebecca nerad advantive podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gainsight.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Gainsight PX
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gainsight PX; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gainsight PX / Gainsway 1Gainsight Px 1
Follow Gainsight PX
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gainsight PX is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Gainsight PX is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Drive adoption with in-app guidance that meets users where they get stuck.
- For
- Product
- Price stated
- Request Pricing gainsight.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial gainsight.com/pricing
- Certifications
- CCPAGDPRHIPAAISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 2
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What Gainsight PX's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gainsight.com, gainsight.com/pricing, trust.gainsight.com, gainsight.com/platform, gainsight.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gainsight PX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gainsight PX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gainsight PX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gainsight PX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gainsight PX, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.