GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › PushEngage · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PushEngage

19Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PushEngage was named 7 times in Mobile & push, where OneSignal led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business18 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 75

under the label threshold

Enterprise92 of 111

under the label threshold

In mobile & push · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PushEngage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	27 of 75	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PushEngage yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PushEngage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Good for Web Push ... Best for: Small websites focused on web push notifications” Mistral Small · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

“If you want deep automation and e-commerce features, go with PushEngage” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

“Pair with Web Push: PushEngage (or OneSignal)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“described as less suited to deep native-app stacks, so mobile app teams should be careful” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative

“good for narrower use cases, but generally less compelling as the core platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Mobile & push · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PushEngage, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PushEngage was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal18 of 1910Not in the top three

Omnisend10 of 191Not in the top three

Braze9 of 192Not in the top three

Airship7 of 191Not in the top three

Pushwoosh7 of 191Not in the top three

TextMagic6 of 191Not in the top three

Firebase Cloud Messaging6 of 190Not in the top three

Customer.io5 of 191Not in the top three

SendPulse5 of 190Not in the top three

SimpleTexting5 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PushEngage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 19 answers that named PushEngage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

businessofapps.com3

courier.com3

devopsschool.com3

engagelab.com3

guideflow.com3

linkedin.com3

lospollos.com3

maestra.io3

moengage.com3

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming PushEngage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

businessofapps.com/marketplace/push-notifications3

courier.com/blog/top-push-notification-platforms3

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-push-notification-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison3

engagelab.com/blog/best-push-notification-service3

engagelab.com/blog/best-push-notification-service-for-mobile-apps3

g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-mobile-marketing-platform-for-avoiding-unsubscribe-spik3

g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-mobile-marketing-platform-for-sending-messages-users-ac3

guideflow.com/blog/best-mobile-marketing-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PushEngage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PushEngage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pushengage.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.