Every category where a model named PushEngage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	23 of 80	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, PushEngage held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Mobile & push · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 14 of 71

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 26 of 76

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 91 → 63 of 83

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Mobile & push	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 27 → 23 of 80

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated PushEngage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Specializes in web and mobile push notifications, offering robust analytics and segmentation” Mistral Small · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

“PushEngage: Web push, mobile push, $8/mo annual for publishers and content sites.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

“E-commerce: PushEngage, Braze” MiniMax M2.5 · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“primarily web-push-led, so it is less suited to deep native-app stacks” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PushEngage, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PushEngage was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal19 of 209Not among the top eight

Airship13 of 200Not among the top eight

Braze12 of 200Not among the top eight

Twilio Programmable Messaging8 of 200Not among the top eight

Pushwoosh7 of 201Not among the top eight

Attentive6 of 200Not among the top eight

CleverTap6 of 200Not among the top eight

Iterable5 of 200Not among the top eight

SendPulse5 of 200Not among the top eight

Omnisend4 of 201Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PushEngage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named PushEngage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pushengage.comYour site13

courier.com12

onesignal.com12

viasocket.com12

guideflow.com10

pushwoosh.com10

wisepops.com10

engagelab.com9

attentive.com8

g2.com8

Ninety-one of the 104 domain citations in answers naming PushEngage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pushengage.com/best-push-notification-services12

courier.com/blog/top-push-notification-platforms10

guideflow.com/blog/push-notification-software-tools10

wisepops.com/blog/push-notification-software10

attentive.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms8

viasocket.com/discovery/blog/8mskxb/push-notification-services/7-best-push-notification-se8

engagelab.com/blog/best-push-notification-service7

pushwoosh.com/blog/mobile-push-notification-services7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pushengage.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PushEngage takes 0% of first choices and OneSignal takes 45%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “best mobile push notification and sms marketing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“pushengage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,513 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,047 · 26 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,987
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 80 in mobile & push

Segment leader

45%

OneSignal

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 20 answers
Its own site cited: in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on pushengage.com

1,464

subdomains included

Content

551

counted in the table below

Documentation

167

Product · Integration

39 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	476	18	2026-08-19	SEO, Direct mail
Comparison	29	4	2026-09-14
News or press	25	1	2026-07-06
Case study	10	0	2022-03-22
Report or ebook	4	0	2019-08-23
Webinar or virtual event	2	0	2025-10-30
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2024-03-25
Conference or event	1	0	2024-06-24
Template or tool	1	0	2024-06-13
Podcast or video	1	0	2023-02-23

Most recent

2026-09-14Pushengage vs onesignal comparison
2026-08-19Pushengage mcp beginners guide blog
2026-08-18Mobile app push notifications blog
2026-08-18Multi client pushengage mcp blog
2026-08-17Best push notification services blog
2026-08-17Chat widgets ai assistant blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pushengage.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow PushEngage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

PushEngage is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: customer engagement and retention platform
pushengage.com
For: retention teams
pushengage.com
Price stated: Pricing is based on the active subscribers you reach, and paid plans include unlimited campaigns. Paid plans start at $8 a month, billed yearly. pushengage.com
Starting price: $8 a month pushengage.com
Free plan or trial: Free plan, no card needed. The free plan covers one website or app with up to 200 subscribers and 30 campaigns. pushengage.com
Integrations claimed: 9000 pushengage.com/pricing
Certifications: Apple Push Notification serviceFirebase Cloud MessagingGDPR compliantWPBeginner VerifiedSecure and GDPR Compliant
Customers named: ArkadiumSaleduckLoanMartPhootoCharlton AthleticShoutMeLoudWaterScienceUVLIZER
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What PushEngage's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pushengage.com, pushengage.com/pricing, trust.pushengage.com, pushengage.com/platform-overview, pushengage.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PushEngage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PushEngage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PushEngage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PushEngage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PushEngage, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.