7 categories · RankedPiwik PRO
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 10 of 91 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | |
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 21 of 52 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Osano at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 67 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | |
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 88 of 159 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 69 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Product analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 22 of 40 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 44 of 56 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Piwik PRO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“tools like Piwik PRO (great for GA-style marketing)... often offer better compliance, zero sampling, and superior support than GA4” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Web analytics · scale prompt · first choice
“Self-hosted open-source tools (e.g., Matomo, Piwik Pro) – Offer full data ownership and control, but require ongoing DevOps effort” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Web analytics · negative prompt · alternative
“Look for European-hosted platforms (like *consentmanager* or *Piwik PRO*) that guarantee end-to-end EU data residency.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Consent · negative prompt · alternative
“Matomo / Piwik PRO is the preferred path where privacy control / data residency is strategically important.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Web analytics · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Piwik PRO, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Piwik PRO was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 48 answers that named Piwik PRO and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
124 of the 141 domain citations in answers naming Piwik PRO came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
piwik.pro is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Piwik PRO takes 2% of first choices and Google Analytics 4 takes 57%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“piwik pro”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 95,862 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,721 · 357 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,702
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 48 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 45 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 429 | 5 | 2026-08-31 | DMP, CDP | |
| Glossary or explainer | 373 | 3 | 2026-07-17 | Consent, Product analytics | |
| Report or ebook | 99 | 0 | 2025-09-18 | ||
| Comparison | 60 | 0 | 2025-04-25 | CDP, DMP | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | CDP | |
| Case study | 30 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 15 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | CDP | |
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2025-11-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-31Funnel recovery how to recover lost conversions blog
- 2026-08-24Hipaa violations and fines blog
- 2026-07-29Edpb data anonymization guidelines blog
- 2026-07-17On premises self hosted glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-17Cloud hosting glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-08What is protected health information phi glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page piwik.pro exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CDP (30); 37 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Piwik PRO
Follow Piwik PRO
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Piwik PRO is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Privacy-first analytics & data activation platform; privacy-focused and HIPAA-supportive analytics platform for highly regulated industries.
- For
- marketing teams in highly regulated industries
- Price stated
- Cost-efficient pricing that fits your budget as you scale piwik.pro
- Starting price
- 366 piwik.pro/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- The free trial lasts 30 days. piwik.pro/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IISOC 2HIPAA
- Hosting
- US regionsAzureEU-owned serversHIPAA-compliant servers
- Customers named
- Shepherd CenterAptar GroupRochester Regional HealthHopkins Agency
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Piwik PRO's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: piwik.pro, piwik.pro/pricing, piwik.pro/platform, piwik.pro/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Piwik PRO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Piwik PRO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Piwik PRO by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Piwik PRO is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Piwik PRO, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.