AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Matomo · October 2026 Edition
7 categories · Ranked

Matomo

185Judge labels
3First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Web analytics for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 91 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 54 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Matomo →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In web analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Matomo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Web analyticsGTM data and infrastructure2%8 of 914%54accepted challenger
Attribution and marketing mix modelingMarketing0%25 of 1230%6under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Customer intelligence and data scienceGTM data and infrastructure0%98 of 14240%5under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Product analyticsGTM data and infrastructure0%12 of 400%4under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Session replay and heatmapsGTM data and infrastructure0%25 of 560%3under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%60 of 1550%2under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing0%35 of 710%1under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Matomo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Matomo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash12104
Perplexity Sonar04004
Grok 4.1 Fast172010
Mistral Small22116
DeepSeek V4 Flash06107
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash072211
Kimi K202417
GLM 4.7 FlashX25007
MiniMax M2.511305
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B14106

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels1
Paraphrase18 labels1
Comparative41 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained36 labels1
Scale-constrained19 labelsNone
Negative47 labels10not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative185 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“privacy-focused / self-hosted alternatives such as Matomo, Fathom Analytics, Plausible and similar cookieless trackers are the ones repeatedly highlighted for 100% data ownership” Muse Glimmer 30B · Web analytics · negative prompt · first choice
“Safer alternatives (privacy-focused, often cookieless, self-hostable, EU-compliant): Matomo (open-source, full data ownership)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Web analytics · negative prompt · first choice
“Examples include platforms like Matomo, Fathom, Plausible, and others that prioritize privacy by design.” MiniMax M2.5 · Web analytics · negative prompt · first choice
“consider privacy-first tools like Plausible, Fathom, Matomo, or Simple Analytics” Mistral Small · Web analytics · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Who to avoid (if you lack engineers): Matomo (self-hosted), Piwik” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Self-Hosted Matomo - SECURITY VULNERABILITIES ... 126GB database allegedly sold on cybercrime forum” Kimi K2 · Web analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“they require significant DevOps resources to set up and maintain” Mistral Small · Customer intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Avoid the Self-Hosted Version in Europe” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Web analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Matomo, over the 185 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Matomo was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Plausible Analytics88 of 18520Not among the top eight
Adobe Analytics86 of 18513Not among the top eight
Heap44 of 1850Not among the top eight
Fathom42 of 1853Not among the top eight
Hotjar35 of 1851Not among the top eight
Piwik PRO32 of 1852Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Matomo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 167 of the 185 answers that named Matomo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

matomo.orgYour site77
linkedin.com73
amplitude.com57
improvado.io45
similarweb.com40
statsig.com37
uxcam.com35
contentsquare.com32
g2.com32
spiceworks.com32

383 of the 460 domain citations in answers naming Matomo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

matomo.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Matomo takes 2% of first choices and Google Analytics 4 takes 57%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “web analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best web analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“matomo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
87 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 35,015 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,916 · 384 in the top three
Sites linking to it
83,629
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
14 ads · 14 text · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as InnoCraft Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 5 in the year, 9 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 91 in web analytics
Segment leader
57%
Google Analytics 4
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
185 answers
Its own site cited
in 167 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on matomo.org
6,751
subdomains included
Content
1,998
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,405
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,142232026-09-24SEO, Mobile apps
Report or ebook48742026-07-29SEO
Comparison18622026-07-01
Podcast or video5202025-07-15SEO
Glossary or explainer5022026-08-01SEO
Case study2802024-12-02
Conference or event2402024-11-01
Template or tool1762026-09-21
Webinar or virtual event622026-08-12
News or press602023-05-29

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page matomo.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (28); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Matomo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Matomo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Matomo (formerly Piwik) 8Matomo (self-hosted) 3Matomo (Piwik) 1Matomo (Pro) 1Matomo (formerly Piwik PRO) 1Matomo/Piwik PRO 1

Follow Matomo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Matomo.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
matomo.org
Headquarters
New Zealand
Founded
2007

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Privacy-first analytics you can trust; an Analytics Platform
For
teams
Price stated
Start a 21-day free Cloud trial, or self-host forever for free. Full access to all features. No credit card required. matomo.org
Starting price
Free matomo.org/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start a 21-day free Cloud trial, or self-host forever for free. matomo.org
Integrations claimed
100 matomo.org
Certifications
Certified ISO 27001:2022ISO 27001:2022
Hosting
Frankfurt, GermanyIn EuropeHosted on our servers
Customers named
YorbaOptimize SmartMDFT AcademyConcrete CMSMetaLocatorStockholm University7AssetsMandarine Academy

What Matomo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: matomo.org, matomo.org/pricing, trust.matomo.org, matomo.org/features, matomo.org/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Matomo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Matomo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Matomo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Matomo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Matomo, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at matomo.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.