Every category where a model named Convo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales enablement and content	Sales	0%	18 of 81	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	27 of 124	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%
Conversational intelligence and call recording	Sales	0%	20 of 93	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 52%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Convo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Convo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	3	1	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	3	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Convo is unique at this price point—it's the only tool under $25/user that provides real-time help” Kimi K2 · Conversation intel · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Real-Time Coaching... Cons: Less comprehensive than full enablement suites” Mistral Small · Sales coaching · direct prompt · alternative

“Add real-time help as the coaching pillar (Convo's AI sales coach)” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales enablement · negative prompt · alternative

“Other options include SalesHood, Spekit, Dock, and Convo” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales coaching · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Convo, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Convo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spekit19 of 324Not in the top three

SalesHood18 of 324Not in the top three

Gong16 of 322Not in the top three

Allego16 of 321Not in the top three

Highspot16 of 321Not in the top three

Seismic16 of 321Not in the top three

MindTickle15 of 323Not in the top three

Showpad15 of 321Not in the top three

Avoma12 of 324Not in the top three

Fireflies.ai11 of 323Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Convo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 32 answers that named Convo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apollo.io1

captivateiq.com1

croclub.com1

dock.us1

hyperbound.ai1

itsconvo.com1

leadangel.com1

leadfeeder.com1

mindtickle.com1

salesforce.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Convo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

apollo.io/insights/best-sales-enablement-tools1

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-enablement-platform1

croclub.com/tools/best-sales-enablement-software1

dock.us/library/sales-enablement-software1

hyperbound.ai/blog/best-enterprise-sales-enablement-20261

itsconvo.com/blog/sales-enablement-platforms1

leadangel.com/blog/operations/sales-enablement-tools1

leadfeeder.com/blog/sales-automation/sales-enablement-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Convo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Convo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at convoso.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.