Order management systems for enterprise buyers
Asked as “order management system”, and as “omnichannel order orchestration software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
44%
Clear leader
44IBM Sterling Order Management09Manhattan Active Omni07Manhattan Active Order Management40others
44% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Zoho Inventory vs BrightpearlZoho Inventory vs Cin7 OmniZoho Inventory vs Kibo CommerceNetSuite Order Management vs Kibo Order ManagementNetSuite Order Management vs Oracle NetSuiteNetSuite Order Management vs BrightpearlNetSuite Order Management vs Cin7 OmniNetSuite Order Management vs Kibo CommerceKibo Order Management vs Oracle NetSuiteKibo Order Management vs BrightpearlKibo Order Management vs Cin7 OmniKibo Order Management vs Kibo CommerceOracle NetSuite vs BrightpearlOracle NetSuite vs Cin7 OmniOracle NetSuite vs Kibo CommerceBrightpearl vs Cin7 OmniBrightpearl vs Kibo CommerceCin7 Omni vs Kibo Commerce
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
I01
M02
M03
04
05
06
07
08S09
10
11S12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01IBM Sterling Order Management44%
02Manhattan Active Omni9%
03Manhattan Active Order Management7%
04Fluent Order Management4%
Fluent Order Management4%05NetSuite Order Management4%
NetSuite Order Management4%06Kibo Order Management2%
Kibo Order Management2%07SAP Commerce Cloud2%
SAP Commerce Cloud2%08Oracle Order Management2%
Oracle Order Management2%09SAP S/4HANA2%
10Salesforce Order Management0%
Salesforce Order Management0%11Blue Yonder Order Management0%
Blue Yonder Order Management0%12SAP Order Management0%
What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP S/4HANA
70%
7 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“ERP Systems Repurposed as OMS (e.g., SAP, Oracle ERP, Microsoft Dynamics in basic setups) - Why avoid/caution?” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Salesforce Order Management18%
6 of 33 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Systems to Avoid for Your Use Case: Salesforce Order Management: Per-user pricing ... becomes prohibitively expensive at scale” Kimi K2, budget prompt
IBM Sterling
44%
4 of 9 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“IBM\u2019s own Sterling documentation routes custom external-system integration through its customization approach; that is a reason to scrutinize implementation effort and ongoing skills needs—not a reason to reject Sterling outright.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Shopify OMS100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Small-Business / SMB E-commerce OMS (e.g., basic Shopify Plus order management, ShipStation...) **Avoid if you are processing tens of thousands of orders daily**” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1082 links across 276 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
42 answers · 65 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Kibo Commerce35 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
33 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Moxo21 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Monday.com18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · IBM17 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Pipe1716 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best order management system”, “order management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Sterling Order Management | 44% | 210 | 10 | |||||
| Manhattan Active Omni | 9% | 140 | 2 | |||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 4%, Oracle Order Management 2%, Oracle Fusion Cloud Order Management 2% | 9% | 20 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Manhattan Active Order Management | 7% | 30 | 0 | |||||
| Fluent Order Management fluentcommerce.com | 4% | 30 | 10 | 0 | 1,704 | 13 | ||
| NetSuite Order Management netsuite.com | 4% | 47 | 110 | 4 | 2,262,234 | $81,140 | 113 | |
| Acumatica acumatica.com | 4% | 8 | 12,100 | 242 | 130,487 | $2,934 | 120 | |
| Kibo Commerce kibocommerce.com Kibo Order Management 2%, Kibo Commerce 0% | 2% | 29 | 480 | 8 | 5,247 | 13 | 7 | |
| SAP parent site SAP Commerce Cloud 2% | 2% | 102 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| SAP Order Management Services | 2% | 135,000 | 74,309 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (kibocommerce.com, manh.com, monday.com). The first result for “best order management system” is metaoption.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best order management system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which omnichannel order orchestration software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade order management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best order management system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an order management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which order management systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceSAP Order Management ServicesChangedManhattanDeposcoagainst: NetSuite Order Management, Oracle, SAP Commerce Cloud, Salesforce Order Managementno first choiceagainst: QuickBooks Commerce, Skubana
Four alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Fluent Order Management, IBM Sterling, Kibo Composable Commerce PlatformEight alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Fluent Order Management, IBM, Kibo Commerce, NetSuite Order Management, Oracle Order Management, SAP S/4HANA Order Management, SalesforceTwo alternatives
Brightpearl, Microsoft Dynamics 365 SalesGPT-5.4 miniIBM Sterling Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order ManagementHeldSAP Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order Managementno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Manhattan Order Management, SAP Order Management foundation / SAP Order Management ServicesTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementTwo alternatives
SAP Order Management foundation, Salesforce Order ManagementGemini 3.5 FlashFluent Order ManagementFluent Order ManagementHeldagainst: IBM Sterling Order ManagementManhattan Active OmniAcumaticaagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, Salesforce Order Managementno first choiceagainst: Adobe Commerce, BigCommerce, Cin7, Linnworks, Manhattan Associates, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, NetSuite Order Management, Ordoro, SAP S/4HANA, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, ShipStation, Veeqo
Five alternatives
IBM Sterling Order Management, Kibo Order Management, Manhattan Active Omni, SAP Commerce Cloud, Salesforce Order ManagementFive alternatives
Manhattan Active Omni, Oracle Order Management, SAP Commerce Cloud, SAP Order Management Services, Salesforce Order ManagementFive alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Fluent Order Management, IBM Sterling Order Management, Kibo Commerce, Salesforce Order ManagementTwo alternatives
Fluent Order Management, Manhattan Active OmniPerplexity SonarManhattan Enterprise Promise & FulfillManhattan Active Omni, Manhattan Active Order ManagementChangedno first choiceOracle NetSuiteno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Kibo Order Management, NetSuite Order Management, SAP Commerce CloudThree alternatives
Blue Yonder OM, Kibo Order Management, Oracle CommerceTwo alternatives
IBM Sterling, Manhattan Order ManagementGrok 4.1 FastIBM Sterling Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order ManagementHeldno first choiceIBM Sterling Order Managementno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales, OMS Office Master System, Oracle ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternatives
Manhattan Active Omni, NetSuite Order Management, Oracle Order Management, SAP Order ManagementFour alternatives
Manhattan Active Order Management, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Commerce Cloud, Salesforce Order ManagementFour alternatives
Manhattan Active Omni, Oracle NetSuite OMS, SAP Commerce Cloud, SellercloudMistral SmallIBM Sterling Order Management, Kibo Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order ManagementChangedno first choiceagainst: Adobe Commerce (Magento) Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order Management, OrderEaseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
NetSuite Order Management, SAP Commerce Cloud, Salesforce Order ManagementOne alternative
NetSuite Order ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashIBM Sterling Order Management, SAP Commerce CloudIBM Sterling Order ManagementChangedManhattan Active OmniManhattan Active Omniagainst: Oracle NetSuite OMS, SAP S/4HANA, Salesforceno first choiceagainst: IBM Sterling, Manhattan, Oracle EBS, SAP ECC/ S/4HANA, SAP OMS, ShipStation, Shopify OMS
Four alternatives
Manhattan Active Order Management, NetSuite Order Management, Oracle Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementTwo alternatives
Manhattan Active Order Management, SAP Commerce CloudFive alternatives
IBM Sterling Order Management, NetSuite SuiteCommerce, Oracle Fusion Cloud Order Management, SAP Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementThree alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Brightpearl, Kibo Order ManagementLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceIBM Sterling Order ManagementChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Kibo Order ManagementQwen 3.7 FlashSAP S/4HANAIBM Sterling Order ManagementChangedno first choiceOracle NetSuiteagainst: Infor, SAP S/4HANA, Shopify OMSno first choiceagainst: Adobe Commerce, Airtable, Klaviyo, Oracle, SAP S/4HANA, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Shopify OMS, Siebel, Zoho
Five alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, IBM Sterling Order Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM, Oracle NetSuite SuiteCommerce Advanced, Salesforce Order ManagementThree alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Kibo Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementFive alternatives
Manhattan Active OMS, NetSuite ERP Order Management, Oracle Order Management, SAP S/4HANA, Salesforce Order ManagementTwo alternatives
BigCommerce, Salesforce Order ManagementKimi K2IBM Sterling Order Management, Manhattan Active Order ManagementManhattan Active OmniChangedagainst: Fluent Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order ManagementAcumaticaagainst: Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Salesforce Order Managementno first choiceagainst: Adobe Commerce, IBM Sterling Order Management, QuickBooks Online, SAP Commerce Cloud, Shopify OMS
Two alternatives
Oracle Order Management, SAP Order ManagementThree alternatives
IBM Sterling Order Management, SAP Commerce Cloud, SAP Order ManagementSeven alternatives
Fluent Order Management, Manhattan Active Omni, NetSuite Order Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud Order Management, SAP Commerce Cloud, SAP Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementTwo alternatives
IBM Sterling Order Management, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Intelligent Order ManagementGLM 4.7 FlashXNetSuite Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order ManagementChangedno first choiceIBM Sterling Order Managementno first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternatives
Cin7, Fluent Order Management, Kibo Commerce, SAP Commerce CloudTwo alternatives
Manhattan Active Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementMiniMax M2.5NetSuite Order ManagementManhattan Active Order ManagementChangedno first choiceBrightpearlno first choiceagainst: IBM Sterling, Manhattan Active Omninothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Commerce, SAP Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementFour alternatives
IBM Sterling Order Management, Kibo Commerce, NetSuite Order Management, SAP Order ManagementThree alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP Commerce Cloud, SAP Order ManagementGPT-6 LunaIBM Sterling Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order ManagementHeldagainst: Salesforce Order Managementno first choiceIBM Sterling Order Managementagainst: Salesforce Order Managementno first choiceagainst: IBM Sterling
Three alternatives
Manhattan ActiveOrder, Oracle Fusion Cloud Order Management, SAP's order-management capabilitiesTwo alternatives
Manhattan Active Order Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud Order ManagementOne alternative
Fluent Order ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BOracle Fusion Cloud Order Management, Oracle Order ManagementIBM Sterling Order Management, Manhattan Active OmniChangedIBM Sterling OMSno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Brightpearl, IBM Sterling, Linnworks, Manhattan Active Omni, OrderCircle, SAP Commerce Cloud OMS, Salesforce Order Management, Veeqo
Three alternatives
NetSuite OMS, SAP S/4HANA Cloud Order Management / SAP Commerce Cloud, Salesforce Order ManagementFour alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Kibo Order Management, NetSuite Order Management, Oracle Order ManagementEight alternatives
Blue Yonder Order Management, Fluent Order Management, Kibo Order Management, Manhattan Active Order Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud Order Management, Oracle Order Management, SAP S/4HANA Cloud Order Management, Salesforce Order ManagementBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:34 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:35 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 12 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:24 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:48 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:12 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:21 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 19 | 53 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:10 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:10 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:35 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:49 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:23 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 15 | 78 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:11 | yes | 18 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:25 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:03 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:26 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 25 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:33 | yes | 15 | 123 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 7 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:10 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:08 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:33 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:34 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 20 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:11 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:55 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:28 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:46 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 25 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:42 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:39 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:10 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:09 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:29 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 22 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:59 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:23 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:15 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:43 | yes | 23 | 75 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:47 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:15 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Blue Yonder read as Blue Yonder Order Management
Blue Yonder (JDA) read as Blue Yonder Order Management
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA) read as Blue Yonder Order Management
Fluent Commerce read as Fluent Order Management
Fluent Commerce (Fluent OMS) read as Fluent Order Management
Fluent Commerce (Fluent Order Management) read as Fluent Order Management
KIBO read as Kibo Order Management
KIBO OMS read as Kibo Order Management
Kibo read as Kibo Order Management
Kibo (by Marigold) read as Kibo Order Management
NetSuite read as NetSuite Order Management
NetSuite (Oracle NetSuite) read as NetSuite Order Management
SAP read as SAP S/4HANA
Shopify read as Shopify OMS
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Commerce (Magento) Order Management
Descartes
Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
Fluent Commerce Fluent Order Management
G2 Order Management Software
Hana Commerce
Infor CloudSuite
Jinba Flow
Kibo Composable Commerce Platform
Körber OMS
LogistieX
Manh Order Management Software
Manhattan ActiveOrder
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Commerce
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
Moxo B2B Order Management Software
NetSuite ERP Order Management
NetSuite SuiteCommerce (Oracle NetSuite OMS)
Oracle
Oracle EBS
Oracle ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM (Supply Chain Management)
Oracle Fusion Order Management
Oracle NetSuite SuiteCommerce Advanced
Rework Commerce Ops
SAP Commerce Cloud OMS
SAP ECC/ S/4HANA
SAP Order Management foundation
SAP Order Management foundation / SAP Order Management Services
SAP S/4HANA Cloud Order Management
SAP S/4HANA Cloud Order Management / SAP Commerce Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Order Management
SAP's order-management capabilities
Salesforce
Zoho
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.