Every category where a model named Fluent Order Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	20 of 131	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fluent Order Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fluent Order Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Composable/Best-of-Breed Route (High Growth & Omnichannel) ... Fluent Commerce, Kibo Commerce, Deck Commerce” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Order management · scale prompt · alternative

“Choose Fluent Commerce if you want a modern, future-proof, API-first OMS” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you need sophisticated fulfillment orchestration: Fluent Commerce” Kimi K2 · Order management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“worth considering when flexibility and evolving workflows matter” GPT-6 Luna · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fluent Order Management, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fluent Order Management was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Blue Yonder Order Management15 of 300Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling Order Management13 of 305Not among the top eight

Manhattan Active Omni13 of 304Not among the top eight

Salesforce Order Management13 of 300Not among the top eight

NetSuite Order Management11 of 301Not among the top eight

Kibo Order Management9 of 301Not among the top eight

Kibo Commerce8 of 300Not among the top eight

Oracle Order Management8 of 300Not among the top eight

SAP Commerce Cloud8 of 300Not among the top eight

Brightpearl6 of 300Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fluent Order Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Fluent Order Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

manh.com22

kibocommerce.com18

theretailexec.com17

learn.g2.com14

gitnux.org10

pipe17.com10

fluentcommerce.comYour site8

supplychainresearch.com8

worldmetrics.org8

monday.com7

114 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Fluent Order Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

manh.com/our-insights/resources/articles/best-order-management-software-oms-compared20

kibocommerce.com/blog/best-order-management-systems18

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software14

theretailexec.com/tools/best-enterprise-order-management-system12

pipe17.com/blog/top-15-order-management-systems-for-agentic-commerce-in-20259

supplychainresearch.com/research-library/buyers-guide-order-management-systems8

msdynamicsworld.com/blog-post/10-best-order-management-systems-updated7

clickpost.ai/blog/order-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fluentcommerce.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fluent Order Management takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Inventory takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “order management system”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best order management system”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“fluent order management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,704 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 781 · 46 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,656
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

13 ads · 13 text · 13 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2022, as Fluent Retail Pty Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 131 in order management

Segment leader

25%

Zoho Inventory

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on fluentcommerce.com

380

subdomains included

Content

308

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
News or press	91	0	2026-06-16	Order management, Ecommerce
Blog	89	1	2026-08-13	Order management
Report or ebook	49	undated		Order management
Podcast or video	47	0	2026-05-12
Case study	16	0	2026-06-06
Webinar or virtual event	11	undated		Order management
Comparison	3	undated
Conference or event	2	undated

Most recent

2026-08-13Retailers optimistic about year ahead survey2026 blog
2026-06-16Fluent commerce introduces ai agent to make order sourcing logic easier to understand configure and optimize news or press
2026-06-06Puma case study
2026-06-01Fluent commerce uses ai to fast track migrations from legacy oms platforms to fluent order management news or press
2026-05-27Fluent commerce adds support for multiple ai coding assistants news or press
2026-05-19Fluent commerce receives mach alliances agent ready certification news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fluentcommerce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Fluent Order Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fluent Order Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fluent Commerce 7Fluent Commerce (Fluent Order Management) 1

Follow Fluent Order Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fluent Order Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fluent Order Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fluent Order Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Fluent Order Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fluent Order Management, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.