Every category where a model named Manhattan Active Omni for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	34 of 131	33%	6	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Manhattan Active Omni yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Manhattan Active Omni across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels3

Comparative10 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Manhattan Active Omni (Manhattan Associates) – Dominant in unified commerce.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Order management · comparative prompt · first choice

“Manhattan is widely considered the enterprise gold standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Order management · comparative prompt · first choice

“better if you want a more enterprise-grade omnichannel OMS” Perplexity Sonar · Order management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“massive enterprises that can afford to spend millions on multi-year deployments of legacy platforms like IBM Sterling or Manhattan Active Omni” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Order management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Advanced omnichannel, but enterprise tilt | High (enterprise) | Forrester #1 Leader, may overkill” Grok 4.1 Fast · Order management · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Manhattan Active Omni, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Manhattan Active Omni was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IBM Sterling Order Management15 of 273Not among the top eight

Fluent Order Management13 of 272Not among the top eight

Salesforce Order Management13 of 270Not among the top eight

Kibo Order Management12 of 271Not among the top eight

SAP Commerce Cloud10 of 270Not among the top eight

Blue Yonder Order Management9 of 270Not among the top eight

Brightpearl7 of 270Not among the top eight

NetSuite Order Management7 of 270Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling5 of 270Not among the top eight

Kibo Commerce5 of 270Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Manhattan Active Omni. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Manhattan Active Omni and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

manh.com23

kibocommerce.com19

theretailexec.com18

learn.g2.com12

pipe17.com10

worldmetrics.org10

clickpost.ai9

gitnux.org8

larksuite.com8

monday.com8

No domain is on file for Manhattan Active Omni, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

manh.com/our-insights/resources/articles/best-order-management-software-oms-compared22

kibocommerce.com/blog/best-order-management-systems18

theretailexec.com/tools/best-enterprise-order-management-system14

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software12

clickpost.ai/blog/order-management-software9

supplychainresearch.com/research-library/buyers-guide-order-management-systems8

verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/best-order-management-software8

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/cloud-based-order-management-system7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Manhattan Active Omni stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“manhattan active omni”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 34 of 131 in order management

Segment leader

25%

Zoho Inventory

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Manhattan Active Omni

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Manhattan Active Omni; a claim can dispute any of them.

Manhattan Active Omni (Manhattan Associates) 1

Follow Manhattan Active Omni

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Manhattan Active Omni's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Manhattan Active Omni, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Manhattan Active Omni by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Manhattan Active Omni is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Manhattan Active Omni, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.