Every category where a model named Blue Yonder Order Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	25 of 131	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Blue Yonder Order Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Blue Yonder Order Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Blue Yonder is another enterprise OMS commonly used by large retail and supply-chain organizations.” GPT-5.4 mini · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Consider it if those capabilities are part of the goal, not just order routing.” GPT-6 Luna · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: Large-scale supply chain management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong in supply chain integration.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Blue Yonder Order Management, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blue Yonder Order Management was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fluent Order Management15 of 250Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling Order Management12 of 255Not among the top eight

Salesforce Order Management10 of 250Not among the top eight

Manhattan Active Omni9 of 255Not among the top eight

Kibo Order Management9 of 251Not among the top eight

NetSuite Order Management8 of 251Not among the top eight

Oracle Order Management8 of 250Not among the top eight

Kibo Commerce7 of 250Not among the top eight

Salesforce4 of 251Not among the top eight

Aptos4 of 250Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blue Yonder Order Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 25 answers that named Blue Yonder Order Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

manh.com17

kibocommerce.com14

theretailexec.com11

clickpost.ai10

learn.g2.com10

worldmetrics.org9

gitnux.org7

supplychainresearch.com7

larksuite.com5

moxo.com5

Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming Blue Yonder Order Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

manh.com/our-insights/resources/articles/best-order-management-software-oms-compared15

kibocommerce.com/blog/best-order-management-systems14

theretailexec.com/tools/best-enterprise-order-management-system11

clickpost.ai/blog/order-management-software10

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software10

supplychainresearch.com/research-library/buyers-guide-order-management-systems7

moxo.com/blog/best-b2b-order-management-software5

verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/best-order-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

blueyonder.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Blue Yonder Order Management takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Inventory takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “order management system”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best order management system”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“blue yonder order management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 20,207 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,284 · 240 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 7,194
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

45 ads · 32 text, 7 video, 6 image · 26 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as Blue Yonder, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 15 in the year, 30 before. 4 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 25 of 131 in order management

Segment leader

25%

Zoho Inventory

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on blueyonder.com

10,001

subdomains included

Content

6,494

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

298 · 18

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	4,910	undated
Case study	836	undated
Conference or event	407	undated
Glossary or explainer	188	12	2026-09-29
Report or ebook	53	undated
Webinar or virtual event	34	undated
Podcast or video	27	undated
Comparison	15	undated
Template or tool	12	1	2026-09-29
News or press	12	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29What is ai driven financial forecasting glossary or explainer
2026-09-29What is blue yonder fulfillment glossary or explainer
2026-09-29What is blue yonder merchandise financial forecasting glossary or explainer
2026-09-29What is blue yonder predictive analytics npi glossary or explainer
2026-09-29What is predictive analytics glossary or explainer
2026-09-29What is blue yonder network planning glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page blueyonder.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Blue Yonder Order Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Blue Yonder Order Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Blue Yonder 3Blue Yonder (formerly JDA) 1

Follow Blue Yonder Order Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blue Yonder Order Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blue Yonder Order Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Blue Yonder Order Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Blue Yonder Order Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Blue Yonder Order Management, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.