Every category where a model named SAP Order Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	37 of 131	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Order Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Order Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The definitive choice for global conglomerates requiring a "Single Source of Truth" within a massive, pre-existing SAP S/4HANA ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Order Management, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Order Management was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IBM Sterling Order Management10 of 143Not among the top eight

Salesforce Order Management9 of 140Not among the top eight

NetSuite Order Management6 of 141Not among the top eight

Manhattan Active Omni5 of 142Not among the top eight

Brightpearl5 of 141Not among the top eight

Fluent Order Management5 of 140Not among the top eight

Manhattan Active Order Management4 of 142Not among the top eight

Blue Yonder Order Management4 of 140Not among the top eight

Oracle Order Management4 of 140Not among the top eight

SAP Commerce Cloud4 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Order Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named SAP Order Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

theretailexec.com11

manh.com9

verifiedmarketresearch.com9

learn.g2.com8

kibocommerce.com6

worldmetrics.org6

larksuite.com5

moxo.com5

clickpost.ai4

devopsschool.com4

No domain is on file for SAP Order Management, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

manh.com/our-insights/resources/articles/best-order-management-software-oms-compared9

verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/best-order-management-software9

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software8

theretailexec.com/tools/best-enterprise-order-management-system8

kibocommerce.com/blog/best-order-management-systems6

moxo.com/blog/best-b2b-order-management-software5

clickpost.ai/blog/order-management-software4

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-order-management-systems-oms-features-pros-cons-comparison4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where SAP Order Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“sap order management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 13 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 37 of 131 in order management

Segment leader

25%

Zoho Inventory

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as SAP Order Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Order Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP Order Management / SAP S/4HANA Advanced ATP 1

Follow SAP Order Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP Order Management.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: sap.com
Headquarters: Walldorf, Germany
Founded: 1972
Employees: about 106,043 (2023)
Ownership: Public, SAP on Italian Stock Exchange
Also from SAP: SAP Address Validation, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP Ariba CLM, SAP Ariba Contracts, SAP Billing, SAP Build Process Automation, SAP Business One and 40 more

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Order Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Order Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Order Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SAP Order Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Order Management, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.