Every category where a model named Oracle NetSuite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	9%	4 of 131	20%	10	accepted challenger
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	53 of 56	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle NetSuite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle NetSuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	2	0	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Oracle NetSuite as a strong starting point for omnichannel order orchestration software.” Grok 4.20 · Order management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The Comprehensive Leader: Oracle NetSuite ... this is the industry standard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Order management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Oracle NetSuite (Frequently #1 for mid-sized businesses)” Grok 4.20 · Order management · direct prompt · first choice

“Oracle NetSuite — Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B” Kimi K2 · Order management · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Examples: Salesforce CPQ, Oracle NetSuite, SAP. * Why to avoid: ... notoriously difficult to configure.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proposals · negative prompt · hard negative

“NetSuite’s UI is frequently criticized for being slow, clunky, and unintuitive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Order management · negative prompt · soft negative

“though it can be costly for SMBs with a steep learning curve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Order management · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle NetSuite, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle NetSuite was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Brightpearl9 of 231Compare →

Salesforce Order Management8 of 230Not among the top eight

Kibo Order Management4 of 232Compare →

Cin7 Omni4 of 231Compare →

IBM Sterling Order Management4 of 231Not among the top eight

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales4 of 230Not among the top eight

SAP Commerce Cloud4 of 230Not among the top eight

SAP S/4HANA4 of 230Not among the top eight

Acumatica3 of 231Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling3 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle NetSuite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 23 answers that named Oracle NetSuite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

theretailexec.com13

clickpost.ai9

kibocommerce.com8

learn.g2.com8

gitnux.org7

larksuite.com7

monday.com7

resources.rework.com7

capterra.com6

manh.com6

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Oracle NetSuite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

theretailexec.com/tools/best-enterprise-order-management-system11

clickpost.ai/blog/order-management-software9

kibocommerce.com/blog/best-order-management-systems7

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software7

manh.com/our-insights/resources/articles/best-order-management-software-oms-compared6

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/sales-order-management-software6

resources.rework.com/tools/commerce/best-order-management-software-20266

verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/best-order-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oracle NetSuite stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 9,900 a month (“oracle netsuite”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 280 a month
Its own site: It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 4 of 131 in order management

Segment leader

25%

Zoho Inventory

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Oracle NetSuite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle NetSuite; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle NetSuite / Fusion Cloud ERP 1

Follow Oracle NetSuite

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle NetSuite.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: oracle.com
Headquarters: Bengaluru, India
Founded: 1977
Employees: about 162,000 (2025)
Ownership: Public, ORCL on Nasdaq
Also from Oracle: Oracle ATG, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Oracle BI, Oracle BlueKai, Oracle CDX, Oracle CPQ, Oracle CRM and 46 more

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Oracle NetSuite has a consistent contract model for all programs and services globally.
oracle.com/ae/contracts/netsuite
For: your order of the NetSuite Cloud Services
oracle.com/ae/contracts/netsuite
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Oracle NetSuite's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/ae/contracts/netsuite, oracle.com/apac/contracts/netsuite, oracle.com/asean/contracts/netsuite, oracle.com/africa/contracts/netsuite, oracle.com/europe/contracts/netsuite. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle NetSuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle NetSuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle NetSuite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle NetSuite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle NetSuite, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.