Every category where a model named SAP S/4HANA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	130 of 131	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP S/4HANA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP S/4HANA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise OMS (e.g., $500+/month) like Manhattan or SAP.” Grok 4.20 · Order management · budget prompt · hard negative

“unlike Salesforce or SAP, which sell them as separate products requiring costly integrations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Order management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP S/4HANA, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP S/4HANA was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Salesforce Order Management6 of 180Not among the top eight

Zoho Inventory5 of 182Not among the top eight

Brightpearl5 of 180Not among the top eight

Oracle NetSuite4 of 181Not among the top eight

Salesforce Commerce Cloud4 of 181Not among the top eight

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales4 of 180Not among the top eight

NetSuite Order Management4 of 180Not among the top eight

Oracle4 of 180Not among the top eight

Cin7 Omni3 of 181Not among the top eight

Manhattan Associates3 of 181Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP S/4HANA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 18 answers that named SAP S/4HANA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

larksuite.com6

learn.g2.com6

monday.com6

theretailexec.com6

devopsschool.com5

g2.com5

clickpost.ai4

gitnux.org4

manh.com4

softwareadvice.com4

No domain is on file for SAP S/4HANA, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software6

clickpost.ai/blog/order-management-software4

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-order-management-systems-oms-features-pros-cons-comparison4

manh.com/our-insights/resources/articles/best-order-management-software-oms-compared4

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/sales-order-management-software4

softwareadvice.com/scm/order-management-system-comparison4

softwaretestinghelp.com/order-management-system4

g2.com/categories/order-management/small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where SAP S/4HANA stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“sap s/4hana”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 376 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 130 of 131 in order management

Segment leader

25%

Zoho Inventory

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 18 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as SAP S/4HANA

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP S/4HANA; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP 2

Follow SAP S/4HANA

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP S/4HANA.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: sap.com
Headquarters: Walldorf, Germany
Founded: 1972
Employees: about 106,043 (2023)
Ownership: Public, SAP on Italian Stock Exchange
Also from SAP: SAP Address Validation, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP Ariba CLM, SAP Ariba Contracts, SAP Billing, SAP Build Process Automation, SAP Business One and 40 more

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP S/4HANA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP S/4HANA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP S/4HANA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SAP S/4HANA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP S/4HANA, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.