GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Salesforce Commerce Cloud · September 2026 Edition
Salesforce · 2 categories · Ranked

Salesforce Commerce Cloud

95Judge labels
2First choices
35Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Ecommerce for enterprise buyers
Rank 23 of 98 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salesforce Commerce Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Ecommerce platformsRevenue operations0%23 of 9833%15criticized challenger
Ecommerce marketingMarketing0%141 of 15467%3under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesforce Commerce Cloud yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesforce Commerce Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini02103
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX00235
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels1
Comparative23 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative20 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best if you're already standardized on Salesforce CRM/Service Cloud and have complex catalog/enterprise procurement needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce · scale prompt · alternative
“You're already deeply invested in Salesforce and want commerce tightly integrated into that ecosystem” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“CRM-heavy | Custom ($50K+/yr) | Personalization, Salesforce ecosystem. | High if already on SF.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for enterprise complexity: Adobe Commerce or Salesforce Commerce Cloud” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“For mid-market companies without heavy Salesforce investment, Shopify Plus/BigCommerce + Klaviyo or HubSpot will typically deliver better ROI.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce marketing · direct prompt · soft negative
“overly complex enterprise platforms (like SAP Commerce Cloud or Salesforce) that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to maintain” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“without the enterprise costs of platforms like Salesforce Commerce Cloud or SAP Commerce Cloud” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce · direct prompt · soft negative
“❌ Expensive and complex ❌ Requires significant technical resources” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce Commerce Cloud, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce Commerce Cloud was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Shopify85 of 9525Not in the top three
Adobe Commerce84 of 958Not in the top three
BigCommerce77 of 9511Not in the top three
commercetools48 of 952Not in the top three
SAP Commerce Cloud46 of 950Not in the top three
Elastic Path26 of 951Not in the top three
OroCommerce24 of 951Not in the top three
VTEX20 of 950Not in the top three
WooCommerce19 of 952Not in the top three
Spryker12 of 950Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce Commerce Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 95 answers that named Salesforce Commerce Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bigcommerce.com12
shopify.com10
forbes.com7
virtocommerce.com7
clarity-ventures.com6
elasticpath.com6
oroinc.com6
broadleafcommerce.com5
sparklayer.io5
amzprep.com4

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Commerce Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesforce Commerce Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesforce Commerce Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
Salesforce 3Salesforce Commerce 2

The company

Salesforce is the company behind Salesforce Commerce Cloud.
Website
salesforce.com
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
1999
Employees
about 35,000 (2019)
Ownership
Public, CRM on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Commerce Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Commerce Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesforcecommercecloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack