GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › WooCommerce · September 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

WooCommerce

141Judge labels
22First choices
28Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Ecommerce for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 33 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named WooCommerce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Ecommerce platformsRevenue operations18%3 of 9818%33accepted challenger
Ecommerce marketingMarketing8%5 of 1540%12accepted challenger
Content management systems for marketing sitesMarketing0%29 of 620%2under 10 labels · led by WordPress at 33%
Community platformsCustomer0%50 of 740%1under 10 labels · led by Higher Logic Vanilla at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WooCommerce yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WooCommerce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511114
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash11013
Perplexity Sonar12205
Grok 4.1 Fast21104
Mistral Small12014
DeepSeek V4 Flash13004
Llama 4 Maverick30104
Qwen 3.7 Flash02114
Kimi K212104
GLM 4.7 FlashX13015
MiniMax M2.512115

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels2
Paraphrase10 labels1
Comparative32 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained38 labels19
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative35 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative141 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best choices are Wix Business ($17/month) or WooCommerce on shared hosting (~$15/month total)... WooCommerce wins on flexibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“WooCommerce (Best for Ultra-Low Budget)... For absolute minimum cost: WooCommerce + free plugins + free marketing tools” Mistral Small · Ecommerce marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose WooCommerce if you have some tech-savviness ... and want the absolute lowest long-term costs and total control” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce · budget prompt · first choice
“WooCommerce is usually best for the tightest budget *if you can handle WordPress hosting and setup*” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Many businesses that started with WooCommerce are now reconsidering their technology stack, with the main reasons including performance issues, maintenance costs, and operational complexity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative
“Any standalone website (often run via Shopify or WooCommerce) that sells trending products at steep discounts without clear branding” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Free" but hosting, maintenance, PCI compliance, and plugins add up ($40k-$150k/year at scale)” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative
“Security heavily depends on plugin selection and maintenance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WooCommerce, over the 141 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WooCommerce was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Shopify131 of 14154Not in the top three
Square Online52 of 14111Not in the top three
Wix45 of 1413Not in the top three
Adobe Commerce43 of 1410Not in the top three
Squarespace40 of 1410Not in the top three
Ecwid32 of 1410Not in the top three
Wix eCommerce25 of 1412Not in the top three
Klaviyo19 of 1416Not in the top three
Salesforce Commerce Cloud19 of 1410Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WooCommerce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 141 answers that named WooCommerce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

shopify.com17
forbes.com12
bigcommerce.com11
guideflow.com11
commercepundit.com8
learn.g2.com7
stripe.com7
theretailexec.com7
amzprep.com5
emailvendorselection.com5

Ninety of the ninety domain citations in answers naming WooCommerce came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as WooCommerce

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WooCommerce; a claim can dispute any of them.
WooCommerce (WordPress) 3

The company

WooCommerce.
Website
woocommerce.com
Headquarters
United States
Founded
2011

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WooCommerce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WooCommerce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at woocommerce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack