Every category where a model named Wix eCommerce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Ecommerce platforms	Revenue operations	0%	13 of 98	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%
Ecommerce marketing	Marketing	0%	111 of 154	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wix eCommerce yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wix eCommerce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wix eCommerce \u2014 specifically rated as "best for small US businesses" with integrated marketing tools” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce marketing · budget prompt · alternative

“Wix (from ~$17/month) or Square Online (free) are great alternatives.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for simple, design-first stores: Squarespace or Wix” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce · comparative prompt · alternative

“Wix eCommerce — Best for design flexibility / beginners” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Slow load times for image-heavy stores; Limited scalability for growing businesses; Inconsistent customer support” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wix eCommerce, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wix eCommerce was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Shopify28 of 3019Not in the top three

WooCommerce25 of 304Not in the top three

BigCommerce25 of 303Not in the top three

Ecwid14 of 301Not in the top three

Squarespace Commerce14 of 300Not in the top three

Square Online12 of 302Not in the top three

Adobe Commerce11 of 300Not in the top three

Volusion8 of 300Not in the top three

Salesforce Commerce Cloud7 of 300Not in the top three

Shift4Shop7 of 300Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wix eCommerce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 30 answers that named Wix eCommerce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

shopify.com3

bigcommerce.com2

mrpeasy.com2

amzprep.com1

blogrecode.com1

commercepundit.com1

doofinder.com1

ecommerceceo.com1

emailvendorselection.com1

forbes.com1

No domain is on file for Wix eCommerce, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

mrpeasy.com/blog/best-ecommerce-platforms2

shopify.com/blog/best-ecommerce-platform-small-business2

amzprep.com/top-25-ecommerce-platforms-north-america1

bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/ecommerce-platforms1

bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/small-business-ecommerce1

bigcommerce.com/product1

blogrecode.com/best-e-commerce-platforms-for-online-business1

commercepundit.com/blog/affordable-e-commerce-platforms-for-small-businesses1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wix eCommerce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wix eCommerce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.