Every category where a model named commercetools for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Ecommerce platforms	Revenue operations	0%	18 of 98	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for commercetools yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated commercetools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“composable/MACH for engineering-heavy teams wanting best-of-breed control (you fund integration work)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Adobe Commerce or commercetools unless you have dedicated engineering teams and $500K+ implementation budgets” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as commercetools, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and commercetools was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Adobe Commerce65 of 6811Not in the top three

Shopify59 of 6816Not in the top three

BigCommerce53 of 686Not in the top three

Salesforce Commerce Cloud48 of 681Not in the top three

SAP Commerce Cloud40 of 682Not in the top three

Elastic Path23 of 680Not in the top three

OroCommerce21 of 684Not in the top three

VTEX17 of 680Not in the top three

Spryker15 of 680Not in the top three

Salesforce Marketing Cloud10 of 682Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named commercetools. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 68 answers that named commercetools and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bigcommerce.com8

shopify.com7

sparklayer.io7

oroinc.com6

virtocommerce.com6

broadleafcommerce.com4

elasticpath.com4

netsolutions.com4

clarity-ventures.com3

forbes.com3

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming commercetools came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sparklayer.io/best-enterprise-ecommerce-platforms7

oroinc.com/b2b-ecommerce/blog/enterprise-b2b-ecommerce-platforms5

broadleafcommerce.com/blog/top-5-enterprise-ecommerce-platforms-for-2026-and-how-to-choose4

elasticpath.com/blog/best-enterprise-ecommerce-platforms4

netsolutions.com/insights/enterprise-ecommerce-platforms4

shopify.com/enterprise/blog/b2b-ecommerce-platforms4

bigcommerce.com/articles/b2b-ecommerce/b2b-ecommerce-platforms3

clarity-ventures.com/ecommerce/enterprise-ecommerce-solutions-guide3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as commercetools

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as commercetools; a claim can dispute any of them.

Commercetools 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when commercetools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as commercetools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at commercetools.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.