| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 33 of 142 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 41 of 105 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Contact center quality assurance | Customer | 0% | 29 of 81 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28% | |
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 0% | 30 of 49 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 72 of 84 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 45 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | |
| AI voice agents | Customer | 0% | 91 of 103 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Retell AI at 27% | |
| Call tracking platforms | Marketing | 0% | 51 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43% | |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 42 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 33 of 142 |
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 41 of 105 |
| Contact center QA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 29 of 81, unchanged |
| Customer success | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 30 of 49 |
| Feedback | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 70 → 72 of 84 |
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 111, unchanged |
| AI voice agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 91 of 103, unchanged |
| Call tracking | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 63, unchanged |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 72, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Zendesk - a customer service platform that offers text messaging services, including two-way communication with customers through SMS messages” Llama 4 Maverick · SMS & WhatsApp · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you already use Zendesk, compare its QA add-on, which Zendesk lists at $35 per agent per month” GPT-6 Luna · Contact center QA · budget prompt · alternative
“Best suited for businesses seeking an all-in-one customer support and feedback management solution” Muse Glimmer 30B · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“Zendesk - a customer journey analytics tool that can support both B2B and B2C use cases.” Llama 4 Maverick · Customer intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Verdict: Avoid if you are looking for strategic CX insights rather than just support performance metrics.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Zendesk is a legacy ticketing platform with limited feedback collection features and analysis capabilities compared to dedicated feedback platforms.” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · negative prompt · soft negative
“Intercom and Zendesk charge per seat, but they also charge for their AI agents ... using an "outcome-based" ... model” Gemini 3.5 Flash · In-app messaging · negative prompt · soft negative
“More customer service-centric; useful when support operations are the priority.” Perplexity Sonar · Customer success · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 74 answers that named Zendesk and are not a share of its labels.
151 of the 170 domain citations in answers naming Zendesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,365 | 32 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| News or press | 473 | 4 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Case study | 356 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 114 | 0 | 2025-09-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 102 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 59 | 7 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 48 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Podcast or video | 38 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2025-06-13 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-22 |
Every page zendesk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Zendesk's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zendesk.com, zendesk.com/pricing, zendesk.com/blog/analytics-and-data/security, zendesk.com/platform, zendesk.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zendesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zendesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zendesk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: