Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 18 → 7 of 90
2 categories · Named, not rankedWiserReview
18Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WiserReview was named 9 times in Reviews and 1 other category, where Birdeye led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 97
5%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market8 of 92
4%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WiserReview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 4% | 8 of 92 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 38 of 115 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WiserReview held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 8 of 86
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 8 of 92 |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 115, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WiserReview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WiserReview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels4
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the tightest budgets, WiserReview and SocialPilot typically offer the best value proposition” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice
“WiserReview stands out as one of the best online review management platforms” Grok 4.20 · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice
“For budgets under $20 USD/month, WiserReview (Essentials) and/or RightResponse AI for AI replies are realistic options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative
“Cheapest Paid Option: WiserReview ($9/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“WiserReview — Value option, but check if it scales to your needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WiserReview, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WiserReview was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WiserReview, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WiserReview was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WiserReview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named WiserReview and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
wiserreview.comYour site18
learn.g2.com11
usa.inquirer.net9
surveysparrow.com8
us.fitgap.com7
business.referrizer.com6
embedsocial.com6
g2.com6
socialpilot.co6
swydo.com6
Sixty-five of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming WiserReview came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on wiserreview.com
2,044
subdomains included
Content
1,686
counted in the table below
Documentation
159
Product · Integration
0 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 564 | undated | SEO, Ecommerce marketing | ||
| Comparison | 511 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 501 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | SEO, CDP | |
| Template or tool | 52 | undated | |||
| Case study | 44 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | Direct mail |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28What is a good conversion rate glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page wiserreview.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (12); 3 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as WiserReview
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WiserReview; a claim can dispute any of them.
WiserReview (Essentials) 1WiserReview Starter 1
Follow WiserReview
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WiserReview is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WiserReview is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A review marketing platform that helps you collect, manage, and showcase customer reviews to boost trust and conversions.
- For
- ecommerce brands, coaches, consultants, and B2B brands
- Price stated
- AggregateOffer lowPrice 0, highPrice 61, priceCurrency USD, offerCount 4 wiserreview.com
- Starting price
- 0 wiserreview.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial wiserreview.com
- Integrations claimed
- 30 wiserreview.com · 10 wiserreview.com/pricing · 16 wiserreview.com/security pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 1/2/3ISO 27001ISO 27018GDPRHIPAAPCI DSSPCI DSS Level 1SOC 2
- Customers named
- ADEXQuiet Ink StudioJapanese Natural StonesPlantedBoxYogateriaLife Giving StoreUwearsAero Tech Designs
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What WiserReview's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: wiserreview.com, wiserreview.com/pricing, wiserreview.com/security, wiserreview.com/case-studies, wiserreview.com/glossary/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WiserReview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WiserReview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WiserReview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WiserReview is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WiserReview, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.