Every category where a model named EmbedReviews for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Review and reputation management	Marketing	9%	4 of 103	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EmbedReviews yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EmbedReviews across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained15 labels5

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best online review management platform for a company with a limited budget is EmbedReviews, with an affordable pricing plan starting at just $29 per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice

“EmbedReviews is a top contender for small businesses and startups on a tight budget, with pricing starting at just $29 per month.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice

“🏆 Best Overall Value: EmbedReviews ($29/month) - Great balance of features and price” Mistral Small · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice

“If you're really budget-constrained, start with EmbedReviews.” GPT-5.4 mini · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EmbedReviews, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EmbedReviews was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HiFiveStar8 of 165Not in the top three

NiceJob8 of 161Not in the top three

Reviewflowz8 of 161Not in the top three

Birdeye7 of 160Not in the top three

Podium7 of 160Not in the top three

Prompt Reviews5 of 163Not in the top three

ReviewGrower5 of 161Not in the top three

BrightLocal4 of 160Not in the top three

Yotpo4 of 160Not in the top three

StarFlywheel3 of 162Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EmbedReviews. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 16 answers that named EmbedReviews and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com5

appfollow.io3

embedsocial.com3

socialpilot.co3

usa.inquirer.net3

gartner.com2

guideflow.com2

merchynt.com2

niftybuttons.com2

softwareadvice.com2

No domain is on file for EmbedReviews, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-review-management-software5

appfollow.io/blog/reputation-management-software3

socialpilot.co/reviews/blogs/review-management-software3

usa.inquirer.net/191823/best-reputation-management-software3

appfollow.io/blog/review-management-software2

embedsocial.com/blog/best-reviews-management-software2

gartner.com/reviews/market/online-reputation-management-software2

guideflow.com/blog/online-reputation-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EmbedReviews

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EmbedReviews; a claim can dispute any of them.

EmbedReviews / EmbedSocial 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EmbedReviews's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EmbedReviews, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.