AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › SocialPilot Reviews · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

SocialPilot Reviews

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SocialPilot Reviews was named 3 times in Reviews, where Birdeye led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SocialPilot Reviews for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Review and reputation managementMarketing0%39 of 920%3under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, SocialPilot Reviews held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Reviews · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 18 of 90, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 36 of 86, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Reviews0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 39 of 92, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SocialPilot Reviews across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SocialPilot Reviews offers competitive pricing with a free Starter plan and Pro plan at just $25.5 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative
“Good low-cost alternative: SocialPilot Reviews — free starter plan and Pro at $25.50/month” Perplexity Sonar · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SocialPilot Reviews, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialPilot Reviews was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EmbedReviews3 of 42Not among the top eight
LocalImpact2 of 41Not among the top eight
NiceJob2 of 40Not among the top eight
WiserReview2 of 40Not among the top eight
BrightLocal1 of 41Not among the top eight
AppReviewBot1 of 40Not among the top eight
Birdeye1 of 40Not among the top eight
CommentAssist1 of 40Not among the top eight
Google Business Profile1 of 40Not among the top eight
Grade.us1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SocialPilot Reviews. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named SocialPilot Reviews and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com4
socialpilot.coYour site4
appfollow.io3
usa.inquirer.net3
brightlocal.com2
guideflow.com2
localimpact.com2
surveysparrow.com2
swydo.com2
truereview.co2

Twenty-two of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming SocialPilot Reviews came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

socialpilot.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SocialPilot Reviews takes 0% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 93,623 a month
Searches its site ranks for
28,741 · 423 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,649
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 220 clicks and $3,149 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
48 ads · 40 text, 5 video, 3 image · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as SocialPilot Technologies Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 22 in the year, 26 before. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on socialpilot.co
2,898
subdomains included
Content
756
counted in the table below
Documentation
208
Product · Integration
14 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog424322026-09-28Social media, SEO
Report or ebook10832026-09-22
Comparison9372026-09-28
Glossary or explainer4202026-05-07
Podcast or video3902024-01-07SEO
Webinar or virtual event2302025-07-07
News or press1302025-07-17Social media
Case study802024-01-31
Template or tool402025-11-14
Conference or event202025-11-01

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page socialpilot.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SocialPilot Reviews

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SocialPilot Reviews is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Review Management Platform: Boost Your Online Reputation
For
agencies and brands
Price stated
Free; $30/mo; €29/mo; £25/mo; A$47/mo; $25.50/mo; €24.65/mo; £21.25/mo; A$39.95/mo socialpilot.co/reviews
Starting price
Free socialpilot.co/reviews
Free plan or trial
Start Your Free 14-Days Trial Now; Free for one brand socialpilot.co/reviews
Customers named
DAS42PennyWilliamsWriterCahaba Medical CareGreenphireLife in DüsseldorfBirdhouse Marketing & DesignRed Ball ConsultantsThe Click Town
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What SocialPilot Reviews's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: socialpilot.co/reviews, socialpilot.co, socialpilot.co/plans, socialpilot.co/features/ai-pilot, socialpilot.co/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SocialPilot Reviews's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SocialPilot Reviews, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SocialPilot Reviews by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SocialPilot Reviews is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SocialPilot Reviews, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socialpilot.co is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.