AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › EmbedSocial · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

EmbedSocial

9Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EmbedSocial was named 3 times in Reviews, where Birdeye led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EmbedSocial for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Review and reputation managementMarketing0%38 of 920%3under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, EmbedSocial held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Reviews · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 35 → 15 of 90
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 41 of 86

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Reviews2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 38 of 92

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated EmbedSocial across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your main goal is to display customer reviews on your company website to build trust, this is the best budget option.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative
“Best all-rounder under $30: EmbedReviews / EmbedSocial from $29/mo” Muse Glimmer 30B · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EmbedSocial, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EmbedSocial was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EmbedReviews5 of 92Not among the top eight
ReviewGrower Lite3 of 91Not among the top eight
Podium3 of 90Not among the top eight
HiFiveStar2 of 92Not among the top eight
NiceJob2 of 91Not among the top eight
Yext2 of 91Not among the top eight
Birdeye2 of 90Not among the top eight
BrightLocal2 of 90Not among the top eight
Localith2 of 90Not among the top eight
Prompt Reviews2 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EmbedSocial. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named EmbedSocial and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

embedsocial.comYour site8
learn.g2.com7
surveysparrow.com6
usa.inquirer.net5
zapier.com5
appfollow.io3
brightlocal.com3
thecmo.com3
birdeye.com2
g2.com2

Thirty-six of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming EmbedSocial came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

embedsocial.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, EmbedSocial takes 0% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “online review management platform”
9
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 38 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
9 answers
Its own site cited
in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on embedsocial.com
7,881
subdomains included
Content
871
counted in the table below
Documentation
130
Product · Integration
8 · 26
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog46382026-09-25SEO, Social media
Template or tool288undated
Report or ebook5202025-09-18
Comparison3602026-03-19
Case study29undated
Glossary or explainer202023-10-05
Webinar or virtual event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page embedsocial.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (15); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as EmbedSocial

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EmbedSocial; a claim can dispute any of them.
EmbedReviews / EmbedSocial 1

Follow EmbedSocial

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

EmbedSocial is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
UGC platform that vibe codes website widgets
For
agencies, ecommerce or any business
Price stated
start at $29/month embedsocial.com
Starting price
$29/month embedsocial.com
Free plan or trial
Start free trial; free user-generated content aggregators embedsocial.com
Integrations claimed
5 embedsocial.com/pricing
Certifications
ISO 27001:2022 certifiedGDPR compliance
Customers named
TrovaTripBoston CollegeSeven SonsStorm IMCElegant Medical AlertUnderground Printing
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What EmbedSocial's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: embedsocial.com, embedsocial.com/pricing, embedsocial.com/products/reviews, embedsocial.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EmbedSocial's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EmbedSocial, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EmbedSocial by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where EmbedSocial is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name EmbedSocial, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at embedsocial.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.