Every category where a model named Vero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	6%	3 of 75	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	80 of 136	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vero yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Vero is the strongest choice for mid-market product-led software companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Mobile & push · direct prompt · first choice

“Vero and Customer.io are the two strongest contenders.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · direct prompt · first choice

“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend Vero” MiniMax M2.5 · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Vero as the best value for product-led B2B SaaS teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vero, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vero was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Customer.io10 of 114Not in the top three

Braze9 of 111Not in the top three

OneSignal8 of 112Not in the top three

Iterable5 of 110Not in the top three

Airship4 of 110Not in the top three

CleverTap3 of 110Not in the top three

Courier3 of 110Not in the top three

Klaviyo3 of 110Not in the top three

Attentive2 of 110Not in the top three

Omnisend2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 11 answers that named Vero and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getvero.com3

textus.com3

brevo.com2

courier.com2

getapp.com2

guideflow.com2

activecampaign.com1

attentive.com1

bloomreach.com1

businessofapps.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Vero came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getvero.com/resources/best-email-sms-push-messaging-platforms-in-20263

brevo.com/blog/push-notification-services2

courier.com/blog/top-push-notification-platforms2

getapp.com/marketing-software/sms-marketing/f/push-notifications2

getvero.com/resources/top-6-sms-marketing-platforms-for-b2b-in-20262

guideflow.com/blog/best-mobile-marketing-software2

textus.com/blog/sms-marketing-platform2

activecampaign.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vero.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.