Every category where a model named Trainual for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales coaching and training	Sales	0%	82 of 124	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trainual yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trainual across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase9 labels8

Comparative13 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For process-heavy organizations: Trainual for SOP documentation” Mistral Small · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative

“Small team, simple documentation | Trainual (~$250/month flat)” Kimi K2 · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“good for documentation/reference but don't actually provide conversation practice or skill analytics” Kimi K2 · Sales coaching · negative prompt · soft negative

“Trainual is a popular choice but starts at $249/month *plus* a mandatory $1,000 setup fee” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trainual, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trainual was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gong23 of 433Not in the top three

MindTickle21 of 433Not in the top three

SalesHood16 of 431Not in the top three

PitchMonster15 of 433Not in the top three

360Learning14 of 434Not in the top three

TalentLMS14 of 433Not in the top three

Avoma12 of 435Not in the top three

Hyperbound12 of 432Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub11 of 433Not in the top three

Chorus by ZoomInfo11 of 431Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trainual. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 43 answers that named Trainual and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com3

learn.g2.com3

pitchmonster.io3

alpharun.com2

aspr.ai2

docebo.com2

g2.com2

hyperbound.ai2

pipeline.zoominfo.com2

ringcentral.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Trainual came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-sales-training-and-onboarding-software3

alpharun.com/blog/sales-coaching-software2

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-onboarding-software2

learn.g2.com/best-sales-coaching-software2

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/sales-coaching-software-tools2

pitchmonster.io/blog/best-sales-coaching-programs-teams2

ringcentral.com/us/en/blog/sales-coaching-software2

allego.com/blog/sales-onboarding-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trainual's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trainual, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trainual.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.