Every category where a model named Teachfloor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer education and LMS	Customer	0%	13 of 81	0%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teachfloor yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teachfloor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	2
Kimi K2	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“also attractive for smaller budgets if you want a community-driven academy, with pricing starting at $89/month” Perplexity Sonar · Customer education · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose Teachfloor or Disco if: Community engagement and cohort-based learning are priorities.” Kimi K2 · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

“Community-driven, high-engagement social learning → Teachfloor or 360Learning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

“Cohort + social learning built in, strong engagement focus, lighter enterprise features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teachfloor, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teachfloor was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skilljar35 of 3710Not in the top three

Docebo31 of 371Not in the top three

LearnWorlds29 of 378Not in the top three

Thought Industries26 of 370Not in the top three

TalentLMS23 of 3713Not in the top three

LearnUpon23 of 370Not in the top three

WorkRamp19 of 370Not in the top three

Absorb LMS16 of 370Not in the top three

Disco13 of 370Not in the top three

Intellum12 of 370Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teachfloor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 37 answers that named Teachfloor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

minicoursegenerator.com7

teachfloor.comYour site7

easywebinar.com6

knowlify.com6

meltingspot.io6

guideflow.com5

appcues.com4

continu.com4

disco.co4

dupple.com4

Forty-six of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Teachfloor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

minicoursegenerator.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms7

teachfloor.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms7

easywebinar.com/blog/customer-education-platform6

knowlify.com/articles/best-customer-training-software6

guideflow.com/blog/customer-training-software5

meltingspot.io/en/blog/top-customer-education-platforms5

appcues.com/blog/customer-training-software4

continu.com/software/best-customer-training-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Teachfloor

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Teachfloor; a claim can dispute any of them.

Teachfloor/TalentLMS 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teachfloor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teachfloor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teachfloor.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.