Every category where a model named Salesmotion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales intelligence and contact data	Sales	0%	8 of 44	0%	13	accepted challenger
Sales enablement and content	Sales	0%	19 of 81	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	0%	23 of 75	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%
B2B intent data providers	Sales	0%	22 of 62	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35%
AI SDR agents	Sales	0%	38 of 71	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	44 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	82 of 158	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesmotion yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesmotion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	3
Mistral Small	7	2	9
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	4	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	3
Kimi K2	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	4	4
MiniMax M2.5	4	1	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative40 labelsNone

Budget-constrained21 labels4

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative91 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Salesmotion or 6sense if you already have a list of accounts but need to know which ones are actually in-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“Apollo (budget) or Salesmotion (deeper intelligence) often beat 6sense/ZoomInfo for mid-market on cost-to-value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer intel · direct prompt · alternative

“Salesmotion (Modern Option) ... Teams needing buyer intelligence without enterprise pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales enablement · budget prompt · alternative

“Account intelligence, signals | Salesmotion | 1000+ sources into actionable briefs” Kimi K2 · Sales intel · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesmotion, over the 91 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesmotion was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

6sense51 of 914Not in the top three

Apollo.io48 of 9119Not in the top three

ZoomInfo44 of 9111Not in the top three

Demandbase37 of 913Not in the top three

Gong35 of 915Not in the top three

Cognism34 of 911Not in the top three

Lusha26 of 910Not in the top three

Bombora21 of 913Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub19 of 916Not in the top three

Clari Copilot18 of 917Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesmotion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 91 answers that named Salesmotion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

alpharun.com1

amplemarket.com1

avoma.com1

bitscale.ai1

coffee.ai1

cognism.com1

learn.g2.com1

marketsandmarkets.com1

monday.com1

parsley.id1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Salesmotion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alpharun.com/blog/sales-intelligence-tools1

amplemarket.com/blog/best-sales-intelligence-platforms-20261

avoma.com/blog/sales-intelligence-tools1

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-sales-intelligence-platforms1

coffee.ai/articles/sales-intelligence-platforms1

cognism.com/blog/sales-intelligence-tools1

learn.g2.com/best-sales-intelligence-software1

marketsandmarkets.com/AI-sales/10-best-sales-intelligence-tools-for-b2b-teams1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesmotion

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesmotion; a claim can dispute any of them.

SalesMotion 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesmotion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesmotion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesmotion.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.