AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Salesforce B2B Commerce · October 2026 Edition
Salesforce · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Salesforce B2B Commerce

11Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Salesforce B2B Commerce was named 2 times in Ecommerce marketing and 1 other category, where HubSpot Marketing Hub led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salesforce B2B Commerce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Ecommerce marketingMarketing0%55 of 1150%1under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Ecommerce platformsRevenue operations0%31 of 710%1under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 47%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Salesforce B2B Commerce held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Ecommerce marketing · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 78 of 92, unchanged
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 52 of 106
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 21 → 14 of 110

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Ecommerce marketing0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 62 → 55 of 115
Ecommerce0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 33 → 31 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Salesforce B2B Commerce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you need deep CRM integration and enterprise sales workflows” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce B2B Commerce, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce B2B Commerce was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Adobe Commerce9 of 111Not among the top eight
Shopify7 of 110Not among the top eight
BigCommerce B2B Edition6 of 112Not among the top eight
SAP Commerce Cloud5 of 111Not among the top eight
OroCommerce4 of 111Not among the top eight
HubSpot Marketing Hub3 of 111Not among the top eight
commercetools3 of 110Not among the top eight
Adobe Marketo Engage2 of 112Not among the top eight
BigCommerce2 of 110Not among the top eight
Salesforce Commerce Cloud2 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce B2B Commerce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Salesforce B2B Commerce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

shopify.com10
netsolutions.com7
bigcommerce.com6
ecommerce-platforms.com5
elogic.co5
gelato.com4
guideflow.com4
virtocommerce.com4
amzprep.com3
business.adobe.com3

Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Salesforce B2B Commerce came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesforce B2B Commerce

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesforce B2B Commerce; a claim can dispute any of them.
Salesforce Commerce Cloud / Salesforce B2B Commerce 1

Follow Salesforce B2B Commerce

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Salesforce is the company behind Salesforce B2B Commerce.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
1999
Employees
about 35,000 (2019)
Ownership
Public, CRM on New York Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Interactive workflow to create Commerce B2B Stores and retrieve storefront metadata.
For
users want to: create B2B Commerce stores, build Commerce storefronts, set up B2B stores from Vibes, retrieve Commerce metadata, deploy Commerce experiences, wor
Certifications
PCIGDPRHIPAA compliant
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Salesforce B2B Commerce's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: appexchange.salesforce.com/appxListingDetail, salesforce.com/commerce/cloud, salesforce.com/commerce/b2b-ecommerce, salesforce.com/commerce/b2b-ecommerce-website, salesforce.com/commerce/demos/b2b-commerce. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce B2B Commerce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce B2B Commerce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce B2B Commerce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Salesforce B2B Commerce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Salesforce B2B Commerce, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesforce.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.