Every category where a model named OroCommerce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Ecommerce platforms	Revenue operations	2%	6 of 98	9%	11	accepted challenger
Ecommerce marketing	Marketing	0%	27 of 154	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OroCommerce yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OroCommerce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels5

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“OroCommerce | You need deep B2B-native features from day one” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce · direct prompt · first choice

“The only platform where eCommerce, AI, CRM, CPQ, and pre-built ERP connectors ship as one unified product under a single license” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If you have in-house developers and need to build highly specific, deeply custom B2B buying logic, go with OroCommerce.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“OroCommerce is a strong alternative because it is repeatedly positioned for mid-market to enterprise use” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High setup complexity/cost ($10K–$50K impl.); developer-heavy” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OroCommerce, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OroCommerce was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Shopify40 of 4410Not in the top three

Adobe Commerce33 of 442Not in the top three

BigCommerce29 of 442Not in the top three

Salesforce Commerce Cloud24 of 440Not in the top three

SAP Commerce Cloud23 of 440Not in the top three

commercetools21 of 440Not in the top three

BigCommerce B2B Edition14 of 4410Not in the top three

Spryker11 of 440Not in the top three

VTEX9 of 440Not in the top three

Elastic Path8 of 440Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OroCommerce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 44 answers that named OroCommerce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bigcommerce.com12

oroinc.com12

virtocommerce.com11

wizcommerce.com11

forbes.com8

shopify.com8

learn.g2.com7

netsolutions.com7

sparklayer.io7

guideflow.com6

Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming OroCommerce came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wizcommerce.com/blog/best-b2b-ecommerce-platforms11

bigcommerce.com/articles/b2b-ecommerce/b2b-ecommerce-platforms9

virtocommerce.com/blog/best-b2b-ecommerce-platforms9

learn.g2.com/best-ecommerce-platforms7

oroinc.com/b2b-ecommerce/b2b-ecommerce-comparison7

shopify.com/enterprise/blog/b2b-ecommerce-platforms7

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-b2b-ecommerce-platform6

guideflow.com/blog/b2b-ecommerce-platforms6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OroCommerce

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OroCommerce; a claim can dispute any of them.

OroCommerce Enterprise 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OroCommerce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OroCommerce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orocommerce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.