Every category where a model named ProductFruits for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital adoption and onboarding	Customer	0%	19 of 58	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ProductFruits yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ProductFruits across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“~$79–$149/month (1,500 users) with AI-assisted onboarding and transparent pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Digital adoption · budget prompt · alternative

“Best Analytics: ProductFruits ... Best for: Small SaaS businesses needing analytics” Mistral Small · Digital adoption · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ProductFruits, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProductFruits was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

WalkMe14 of 152Not in the top three

Whatfix14 of 152Not in the top three

HelpHero13 of 154Not in the top three

UserGuiding12 of 156Not in the top three

Pendo12 of 150Not in the top three

Userpilot11 of 153Not in the top three

Hopscotch11 of 151Not in the top three

Userflow11 of 150Not in the top three

Apty9 of 150Not in the top three

Tango6 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProductFruits. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 15 answers that named ProductFruits and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

userpilot.com2

appcues.com1

apty.ai1

chameleon.io1

devopsconsulting.in1

digital-adoption.com1

gartner.com1

guideflow.com1

howdygo.com1

inlinemanual.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming ProductFruits came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

userpilot.com/blog/digital-adoption-platforms2

appcues.com/blog/product-adoption-software-platforms1

apty.ai/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms1

apty.ai/blog/digital-adoption-platforms-failures1

chameleon.io/blog/digital-adoption-platforms1

devopsconsulting.in/blog/top-10-digital-adoption-platforms-features-pros-cons-and-comparis1

digital-adoption.com/dap-comparison1

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-adoption-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProductFruits's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProductFruits, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at productfruits.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.