Every category where a model named Hopscotch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital adoption and onboarding	Customer	0%	14 of 58	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hopscotch yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hopscotch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“~$99/month (3,000 MAUs) — tooltips, banners, and walkthroughs for startups” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Digital adoption · budget prompt · alternative

“Most Flexible: Hopscotch ... Best for: Startups needing basic adoption tools” Mistral Small · Digital adoption · budget prompt · alternative

“Hopscotch (affordable, no-code adoption for startups)” Llama 4 Maverick · Digital adoption · negative prompt · alternative

“Hopscotch is another affordable alternative.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Digital adoption · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hopscotch, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hopscotch was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UserGuiding19 of 2211Not in the top three

Pendo19 of 221Not in the top three

HelpHero17 of 229Not in the top three

WalkMe14 of 222Not in the top three

Whatfix14 of 222Not in the top three

Userflow12 of 220Not in the top three

Userpilot11 of 222Not in the top three

ProductFruits11 of 220Not in the top three

Tango10 of 221Not in the top three

Apty8 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hopscotch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 22 answers that named Hopscotch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com4

userpilot.com4

appcues.com3

gartner.com3

apty.ai2

howdygo.com2

inlinemanual.com2

learn.g2.com2

quirktools.com2

reddit.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Hopscotch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms4

userpilot.com/blog/digital-adoption-platforms4

appcues.com/blog/product-adoption-software-platforms3

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-adoption-platforms3

apty.ai/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms2

apty.ai/blog/digital-adoption-platforms-failures2

howdygo.com/blog/digital-adoption-platform2

learn.g2.com/best-digital-adoption-platform2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hopscotch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hopscotch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hopscotch.club is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.