GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › HelpHero · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

HelpHero

29Judge labels
10First choices
2Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Digital adoption for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In digital adoption · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HelpHero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Digital adoption and onboardingCustomer10%4 of 580%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HelpHero yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HelpHero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast11002
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick02002
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels9
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“HelpHero and UserGuiding are the strongest practical picks, with HelpHero appearing to be the cheapest option” Perplexity Sonar · Digital adoption · budget prompt · first choice
“1. HelpHero - Best Overall Budget Option ... If budget is the primary concern: Go with HelpHero ($55/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Digital adoption · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses, HelpHero offers the best balance of affordability and features” Mistral Small · Digital adoption · budget prompt · first choice
“HelpHero edges out for sheer affordability and completeness under $100/month.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Digital adoption · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HelpHero, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HelpHero was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
UserGuiding24 of 299Not in the top three
Pendo21 of 291Not in the top three
Whatfix18 of 292Not in the top three
WalkMe17 of 292Not in the top three
Hopscotch17 of 290Not in the top three
Tango15 of 290Not in the top three
Userpilot13 of 293Not in the top three
ProductFruits13 of 292Not in the top three
Userflow12 of 290Not in the top three
Apty8 of 290Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HelpHero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 29 answers that named HelpHero and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appcues.com4
guideflow.com4
userpilot.com4
chameleon.io3
pendo.io3
quirktools.com3
reddit.com3
userflow.com3
usertourkit.com3
cpoclub.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming HelpHero came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HelpHero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HelpHero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at helphero.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack