Every category where a model named Product Fruits for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
In-app messaging and customer communications	Customer	5%	6 of 113	0%	12	accepted challenger
Digital adoption and onboarding	Customer	0%	16 of 58	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Product Fruits yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Product Fruits across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	3	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels5

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Product Fruits is the top pick for web-based SaaS, combining no-code in-app announcements with Flows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · In-app messaging · comparative prompt · first choice

“Top Pick: Product Fruits ... is currently the top-rated specialist.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · In-app messaging · direct prompt · first choice

“Product Fruits (Top Pick for B2B SaaS)” MiniMax M2.5 · In-app messaging · direct prompt · first choice

“also positioned as a budget option for all-in-one essentials, but the results provided are less consistent on exact pricing” Perplexity Sonar · Digital adoption · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Product Fruits, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Product Fruits was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Userpilot36 of 518Not in the top three

Appcues36 of 513Not in the top three

UserGuiding33 of 5111Not in the top three

Intercom23 of 515Not in the top three

Pendo22 of 511Not in the top three

Whatfix15 of 510Not in the top three

WalkMe14 of 512Not in the top three

OneSignal12 of 515Not in the top three

Braze12 of 512Not in the top three

Chameleon12 of 511Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Product Fruits. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 51 answers that named Product Fruits and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

productfruits.comYour site6

twixor.ai5

userpilot.com5

helply.com4

pickmysoft.com4

guideflow.com3

hellyeahai.com3

knock.app3

plotline.so3

appcues.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Product Fruits came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

productfruits.com/blog/best-in-app-messaging-platforms6

twixor.ai/blog/in-app-messaging-software5

helply.com/blog/10-best-customer-messaging-tools-for-businesses4

pickmysoft.com/blog/best-in-app-messaging-software4

userpilot.com/blog/in-app-messaging-tools4

hellyeahai.com/blog/best-in-app-messaging-platform3

knock.app/blog/the-top-in-app-messaging-tools3

plotline.so/blog/best-mobile-in-app-messaging-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Product Fruits's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Product Fruits, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at productfruits.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.