Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 42
2 categories · RankedProduct Fruits
54Judge labels
7First choices
1Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Digital adoption for small business buyers
Rank 17 of 45 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Product Fruits →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 42
4%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market17 of 45
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In digital adoption · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Product Fruits for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital adoption and onboarding | Customer | 0% | 17 of 45 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 27 of 105 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Product Fruits held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Digital adoption · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 17 of 45
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-app messaging | 5% | 0% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 27 of 105 |
| Digital adoption | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 17 of 45 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Product Fruits across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Product Fruits across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative9 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're willing to invest $79/month, Product Fruits offers more comprehensive features at a competitive price point.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · In-app messaging · budget prompt · alternative
“offers particularly strong value for growing SaaS businesses through its straightforward pricing model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Digital adoption · direct prompt · alternative
“a no-code product adoption and user onboarding tool designed mainly for small to mid-sized SaaS teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Digital adoption · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Starting at $96/month, offers core onboarding features ... at accessible pricing for tighter budgets” Kimi K2 · Digital adoption · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“$79/mo | No | SaaS onboarding flows” Grok 4.20 · In-app messaging · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Product Fruits, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Product Fruits was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Product Fruits, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Product Fruits was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Product Fruits. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 54 answers that named Product Fruits and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
productfruits.comYour site38
userpilot.com36
guideflow.com31
g2.com21
appcues.com17
userguiding.com16
knock.app12
learn.g2.com12
adamenfroy.com9
apty.ai9
163 of the 201 domain citations in answers naming Product Fruits came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
productfruits.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Product Fruits takes 0% of first choices and Userpilot takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
productfruits.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Product Fruits takes 0% of first choices and Userpilot takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital adoption platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best digital adoption platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“product fruits”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 234 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,521 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 585 · 39 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 932
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 45 in digital adoption
Segment leader
30%
Userpilot
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 54 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 54 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on productfruits.com
451
subdomains included
Content
205
counted in the table below
Documentation
189
Product · Integration
26 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 124 | 45 | 2026-09-29 | Digital adoption, In-app messaging | |
| Template or tool | 30 | 20 | 2026-08-06 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 27 | 17 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 14 | undated | |||
| News or press | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-01-21 | Digital adoption |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Best chameleon alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-29Interactive software walkthroughs blog
- 2026-09-29Product onboarding software blog
- 2026-09-25Userpilot alternatives to consider comparison
- 2026-09-24Userguiding alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-22B2b saas onboarding blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page productfruits.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Product Fruits
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Product Fruits is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Product Fruits is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- User onboarding & Product Adoption Platform
- For
- product and growth teams
- Price stated
- Product Fruits Starter begins at $111 a month at 1,500 monthly active users, billed annually. productfruits.com
- Starting price
- 111 productfruits.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial, no credit card needed. productfruits.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantISO 27001 certifiedSOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001GDPR
- Customers named
- KeboolaFPIUMystoreFitnessPlayerAnders Ekström1,300+ companies1,300 teams
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Product Fruits's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: productfruits.com, productfruits.com/pricing, productfruits.com/platform/mcp, productfruits.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Product Fruits's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Product Fruits, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Product Fruits by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Product Fruits is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Product Fruits, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.