Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 of 120, unchanged
Optimizely Content
15Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Optimizely Content was named 5 times in Content marketing, where HubSpot Content Hub led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business46 of 126
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 135
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 122
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Optimizely Content for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 17 of 135 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Optimizely Content held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 of 134, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 of 111, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 135, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Optimizely Content across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Optimizely Content across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Optimizely Content - Best for B2B or B2C teams that need high-quality, human-created content at scale.” Llama 4 Maverick · Content marketing · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Optimizely Content, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optimizely Content was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Optimizely Content, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optimizely Content was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Optimizely Content. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Optimizely Content and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com15
trysight.ai9
thecmo.com7
gitnux.org6
dupple.com5
gartner.com5
worldmetrics.org5
g2.com4
brafton.com3
coremedia.com3
No domain is on file for Optimizely Content, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Follow Optimizely Content
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Optimizely is the company behind Optimizely Content.ShowHide
The company
Optimizely is the company behind Optimizely Content.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- optimizely.com
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2010
- Employees
- about 350
- Also from Optimizely
- NetSpring, Optimizely CMP, Optimizely CMS, Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Optimizely One, Optimizely Web Experimentation
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Optimizely Content's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Optimizely Content, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Optimizely Content by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Optimizely Content is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Optimizely Content, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.