GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Uberflip · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Uberflip

8Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Uberflip was named 4 times in Content marketing and 1 other category, where HubSpot Content Hub led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Uberflip for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%40 of 1590%3under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%60 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uberflip yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uberflip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Demand generation and Account-Based Marketing (ABM)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“PathFactory and Uberflip act as "Content Experience Platforms"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uberflip, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uberflip was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PathFactory5 of 80Not in the top three
HubSpot Content Hub4 of 82Not in the top three
Contently4 of 80Not in the top three
StoryChief3 of 81Not in the top three
CoSchedule3 of 80Not in the top three
Optimizely CMP3 of 80Not in the top three
Semrush3 of 80Not in the top three
Enji2 of 82Not in the top three
6sense2 of 80Not in the top three
Adobe GenStudio2 of 80Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uberflip. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 8 answers that named Uberflip and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com1
demandbase.com1
distribb.io1
glasscanopy.com1
joinbreaker.ai1
omnibound.ai1
prnews.io1
snov.io1
thecmo.com1

Nine of the nine domain citations in answers naming Uberflip came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uberflip's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uberflip, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uberflip.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack