Every category where a model named CoSchedule for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Marketing resource management	Marketing	0%	23 of 110	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%
Social media management	Marketing	0%	32 of 53	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 30%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoSchedule yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoSchedule across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase14 labels1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want a lighter, calendar-first alternative ... but it is not a full budget allocation / committed vs actual spend system” Muse Glimmer 30B · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“CoSchedule is another strong option, known for its marketing calendar and campaign planning features.” Mistral Small · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“CoSchedule: Best dedicated marketing calendar that also publishes social posts.” Llama 4 Maverick · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoSchedule, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoSchedule was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

monday.com Work Management12 of 185Not among the top eight

ClickUp8 of 185Not among the top eight

Wrike for Marketing6 of 181Not among the top eight

HubSpot Marketing Hub5 of 181Not among the top eight

Marmind3 of 181Not among the top eight

Storyflow3 of 181Not among the top eight

Uptempo3 of 180Not among the top eight

Asana2 of 182Not among the top eight

Adobe Workfront2 of 180Not among the top eight

Airtable2 of 180Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoSchedule. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named CoSchedule and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

storyflow.so11

thecmo.com11

learn.g2.com10

monday.com10

teamwork.com8

clickup.com7

g2.com7

coschedule.comYour site6

getapp.com6

blog.copyfol.io5

Seventy-five of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming CoSchedule came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

storyflow.so/blog/best-marketing-campaign-planning-tools-202611

learn.g2.com/best-marketing-calendar-software10

teamwork.com/blog/marketing-planning-software7

clickup.com/blog/marketing-budget-software6

thecmo.com/tools/best-marketing-budget-software6

blog.copyfol.io/marketing-planning-tools5

coschedule.com/pricing5

g2.com/categories/marketing-calendar5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

coschedule.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CoSchedule takes 0% of first choices and Wrike for Marketing takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “marketing resource management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best marketing resource management platform”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,900 a month (“coschedule”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 19 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 38,502 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 22,478 · 141 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 25,313
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

7 ads · 7 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2026, as CoSchedule, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 7 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 110 in marketing resource mgt

Segment leader

24%

Wrike for Marketing

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 18 answers
Its own site cited: in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on coschedule.com

3,037

subdomains included

Content

1,522

counted in the table below

Documentation

280

Product · Integration

8 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	910	0	2025-02-27	SEO, DAM
News or press	333	9	2026-09-21	Content marketing, Social media
Report or ebook	160	0	2025-11-17
Comparison	33	2	2026-08-20
Case study	26	0	2021-07-26
Podcast or video	20	0	2025-05-27
Conference or event	12	0	2024-11-06
Template or tool	12	0	2023-08-28	SEO
Webinar or virtual event	8	0	2021-09-01
Glossary or explainer	8	0	2020-09-21

Most recent

2026-09-21Project insights assistant news or press
2026-09-01Coschedules headline studio recognized by g2 as a high performer for fall 2026 news or press
2026-09-01Coschedule recognized by g2 as high performer for fall 2026 news or press
2026-09-01Coschedules headline studio recognized by g2 as a high performer for summer 2026 news or press
2026-09-01Coschedule recognized by g2 as high performers for summer 2026 news or press
2026-08-31New image features news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page coschedule.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (24); 5 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow CoSchedule

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CoSchedule is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Social Media Calendar That Does It All
coschedule.com
For: marketers and teams
coschedule.com
Price stated: Starter $29 USD Per Month Billed Annually; Professional $49 USD Per Month Billed Annually; Suite Custom plans starting at only $69/month coschedule.com/pricing
Starting price: 29 coschedule.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Try any plan free for 14 days; Start 14-day free trial; Get Started Free coschedule.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 18 coschedule.com/pricing
Customers named: Eb GarganoProductive BloggingErin KoscheiLaerdalStephanie HollowayTimeless Snapshot PhotographySarah MaysThe Printed Edge
Not stated on the pages read: Certifications, hosting

What CoSchedule's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coschedule.com, coschedule.com/pricing, coschedule.com/support/account-settings/security, coschedule.com/hire-mia/use-case/agencies, coschedule.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoSchedule's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoSchedule, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoSchedule by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CoSchedule is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoSchedule, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.